Categories
Jeffrey Epstein royals Sarah Ferguson

Sarah Ferguson sent Jeffrey Epstein an email apology full of flattery in 2011

For decades, we’ve known that Sarah Ferguson (the Duchess of York) also had some kind of relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. While Epstein was trafficking girls to Fergie’s ex-husband Prince Andrew, Fergie was getting money from Epstein. The official story is that Epstein gave Fergie a one-time five-figure sum. Many believe that Epstein loaned Fergie a much larger sum and it was all covered up, because once people found out about the five-figure sum, they freaked out. Did I mention that Epstein gave/loaned Fergie this money after he went to prison the first time? After he was already a convicted p3do? When the British press found out about the money, Fergie had to issue a public statement apologizing for her bad decision. As it turns out, right after her public statement, she sent a private letter/email to Epstein where she apologized to him for the statement and told him she basically did it to save her post-royal career.

A bombshell email obtained by The Mail on Sunday has revealed how the Duchess of York cynically lied when she pledged to cut ties with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Just weeks after publicly disowning the vile billionaire, Sarah Ferguson wrote him a gushing private message calling him a ‘steadfast, generous and supreme friend’ – and admitting she only distanced herself from him to save her own reputation. She sent the grovelling message ‘from the truth of my heart’, less than two months after telling journalists: ‘I will never have anything to do with [Epstein] again.’

The extraordinary email will send shock waves through the Royal Family and will fuel calls for King Charles and Prince William to completely ostracise the disgraced Yorks. It comes just days after the Duke and Duchess launched an ill-judged return to the public limelight with a prominent, and widely criticised, appearance at the funeral of the Duchess of Kent.

Last night a spokesman for the Duchess said that Epstein had threatened to sue her for defamation after her Evening Standard interview and she had been advised to try and ‘assuage’ him. She stands by her public condemnation of the paedophile, the spokesman added.

The emails between the billionaire and the Duchess were exchanged after he was released from a Florida jail in July 2009, having served 13 months of an 18 month sentence for soliciting prostitution from girls as young as 14. Just under 18 months later, in December 2010, Epstein agreed to pay £15,000 owed in unpaid wages and other bills to Sarah’s former personal assistant, Johnny O’Sullivan. The deal, orchestrated by Prince Andrew, allowed a wider restructuring of the Duchess’s debts, which were approaching £5million. Details of Epstein’s generous assistance were uncovered by the media in March 2011, causing embarrassment to the Royal Family.

On March 7, 2011, in the interview with Mr Greig splashed on the front page of the Evening Standard, the duchess made a ‘heartfelt apology’ for accepting Epstein’s cash. In comments that made headlines around the world, she said: ‘I personally, on behalf of myself, deeply regret that Jeffrey Epstein became involved in any way with me. I abhor paedophilia and any sexual abuse of children and know that this was a gigantic error of judgment on my behalf. I am just so contrite I cannot say. Whenever I can, I will repay the money and have nothing ever to do with Jeffrey Epstein ever again.’ Castigating her former friend, she added: ‘What he did was wrong and for which he was rightly jailed.’ And, in apparent exasperation, she pledged to cut off all contact with him. ‘I will never have anything to do with him again. I deeply regret it. How many more times do you want me to underline that?’

But weeks later Sarah was privately disavowing her comments in the desperate email to Epstein revealed today. Writing to her benefactor on April 26, she said: ‘You have always been a steadfast, generous and supreme friend to me and my family. As you know, I did not, absolutely not, say the “P word” [paedophile] about you but understand it was reported that I did. However, I am apologising to you today for not replying to your email or reaching out to you when the tabloids were so horrendous.’

She angrily condemned the media, who she said ‘used me to hurt you beyond realms’, and complained that the controversy over her links to him ‘was the worst nightmare for me’. Despite emphatically telling the Evening Standard that she would never have anything to do with Epstein again, she apologised for not contacting him sooner, saying: ‘It is unlike me’. Justifying her lack of contact, she said: ‘I was advised, in no uncertain terms, to have nothing to do with you and to not speak or email you and if I did I would cause more problems to you, the Duke and myself. I was broken and lost. I shut down and ran away. So please understand, as I do about you, that I was broken and not the strong person you know and I got completely obliterated and I saw all my children’s work disappearing. I didn’t want to hurt Andrew one more time.’

She told Epstein ‘we are, and have both been, in the firing line’ adding that they had ‘both [been] blamed for stuff we have not done.’

And, in perhaps the most jaw-dropping passage, she suggested that she had been told to give the interview as part of a strategy to protect her writing career and charity work. ‘I was instructed to act with the utmost speed if I would have any chance of holding on to my career as a children’s book author and a children’s philanthropist.’

Last night, a spokesman for the Duchess said: ‘The Duchess spoke of her regret about her association with Epstein many years ago, and as they have always been, her first thoughts are with his victims. Like many people, she was taken in by his lies. As soon as she was aware of the extent of the allegations against him, she not only cut off contact but condemned him publicly, to the extent that he then threatened to sue her for defamation for associating him with paedophilia. She does not resile from anything she said then. This email was sent in the context of advice the Duchess was given to try to assuage Epstein and his threats.’

[From The Daily Mail]

I mean, I actually understand her rationale, but arguing “don’t you get it, I was just trying to save myself and keep Epstein from suing me” is a hell of an argument. Somewhat interestingly, Fergie never paid Epstein back, to my knowledge. Not for the widely-reported smaller sum and not for the larger sum which everyone believes Epstein gave her or loaned her. She really took that monster’s money, publicly called him a p3do, then privately told him “don’t worry, I still consider you a friend, besties 4 eva.” Insane. There’s a lot of commentary about what this means and whether King Charles will completely cut his ties with the Yorks, blah blah blah. I’ll have some of that in another post.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, Cover Images.








Categories
donald trump Jeffrey Epstein King Charles III Melania Trump politics royals

Protesters projected images of Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein onto Windsor Castle

Here are some photos of Donald and Melania Trump arriving at Stansted Airport in Essex on Tuesday evening. They didn’t get a formal royal greeting upon their arrival – all of that is happening today, and we’ll have coverage later on (when we get the photos and videos). A brief fashion note: Melania (and that is her, not Fauxlania) wore a long Burberry coat, as a nod to her British hosts. As the Daily Beast pointed out, the Trumps do not travel well, especially these days. Ol’ Droopyface looked half-dead as he gingerly descended down the steps. His cankles made a special appearance as well.

In recent days, there were many “exclusives” from Buckingham Palace about the importance of this state visit and how Downing Street has ordered King Charles to roll out every red carpet for the Trumps. A royal insider told Vanity Fair that Charles “has paid very close personal attention to the visit, overseeing the schedule and being very involved. They are very positive about the visit and very much looking forward to it. I get the impression the king is going to be rather vocal about issues close to his heart, chiefly the environment and energy. Queen Camilla will be very charming and they will both make sure the president and first lady will be made to feel very welcome. I suspect the royals will pull this out of the hat beautifully.”

Well, funny story. Upon the Trumps’ arrival, a group called Led By Donkeys managed to project images of Trump, Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew onto one of Windsor Castle’s towers. Apparently, the prankster-activists were arrested, but the stunt made major news last night and it’s bleeding into the coverage of the state visit today.

Trump being trolled in the UK with images of Jeffrey Epstein being projected on to Windsor Castle. pic.twitter.com/DclaUgKg8E

— Mike Sington (@MikeSington) September 16, 2025

An awkward start to the state visit: the campaign group Led By Donkeys are projecting images of Donald Trump together with Jeffrey Epstein onto Windsor Castle: pic.twitter.com/3tNF1guBWK

— Finlay Duncan (@FinlayD) September 16, 2025

Oh dear. Not such a great diplomatic start. Protesters managed to project images of Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump and Prince Andrew onto the outside walls of Windsor Castle. #Trump #statevisit pic.twitter.com/yO0fnqk5Sa

— Chris Ship (@chrisshipitv) September 16, 2025

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

Categories
donald trump Jeffrey Epstein politics

Jeffrey Epstein’s estate released the ‘bawdy’ birthday letter written by Donald Trump

In July, the Wall Street Journal turned on Donald Trump in a big way. Keep in mind, the WSJ’s editors, journalists and owners agree with Trump like 98% of the time. But the Murdoch family also believes in keeping Trump on a tight leash, so they decided to go all-in on their reporting about Trump’s connections to and friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. WSJ revealed exclusively in July that Trump and Epstein were so close, Trump contributed a “bawdy letter” to Epstein’s 50th birthday book. A book which was organized by Ghislaine Maxwell, btw. WSJ described the letter in detail, including the actual text and the drawing. A short time later, Trump sued the Murdochs/WSJ/Dow Jones for $10 billion over their reporting. Well, Epstein’s estate just turned over the birthday book and wouldn’t you know, Trump’s letter is right there.

Lawyers for Jeffrey Epstein’s estate have given Congress a copy of the birthday book put together for the financier’s 50th birthday, which includes a letter with President Trump’s signature that he has said doesn’t exist.

On Monday, House Oversight Committee members confirmed that they received a copy of the birthday book including the letter bearing Trump’s signature and a second letter that references Trump with a crude joke about a woman from another Epstein associate.

The Wall Street Journal in July reported on the book and the letter bearing Trump’s name, which contained typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman. The letter concluded: “Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.” The signature was a squiggly “Donald” below the waist, mimicking pubic hair.

Trump has denied writing the letter or drawing the picture, calling it “a fake thing.” He also filed a lawsuit against the Journal’s reporters, Journal publisher Dow Jones, parent company News Corp and executives, alleging defamation and saying the letter was “nonexistent.” A Dow Jones spokeswoman said, “We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting.”

Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary, said in a social-media post that Trump’s legal team will continue to pursue its defamation case against the Journal. “As I have said all along, it’s very clear President Trump did not draw this picture, and he did not sign it,” Leavitt said in a post on X.

The Trump administration’s shifting statements about whether it would release the files it has on Epstein have hung over the White House for months. On Sept. 3, Trump called efforts to make public more details about Epstein a politically driven hoax, just as some of the convicted sex offender’s victims visited Capitol Hill to tell their stories of sexual abuse and implored the president and Congress to release further records.

[From The Wall Street Journal]

To be clear, Trump’s denials have included: that’s not my signature; I don’t draw; I never contributed anything to Epstein’s birthday book; Epstein stole girls from Mar-a-Lago; Bill Clinton!!!; all of this is a Democrat hoax; there is no Epstein client list and I’m certainly not on it. And there are like twenty more denials I’m forgetting.

https://t.co/UHCLQHru1g pic.twitter.com/uyEI6l1IjE

— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) September 8, 2025

Cope and seethe @PressSec https://t.co/jDbvxNshGS pic.twitter.com/Rn9BXeeUYP

— Democrats (@TheDemocrats) September 8, 2025

Photos courtesy of Cover Images, Backgrid.

Categories
Jeffrey Epstein Melania Trump Prince Andrew

Andrew Lownie removed the Melania Trump-Jeffrey Epstein sections from his book

Embed from Getty Images

Author/journalist Michael Wolff has written extensively about Donald Trump, Melania, Jeffrey Epstein and the ties that bind. Wolff recently reiterated his belief/knowledge of Melania’s involvement in Epstein’s circle in the 1990s, and Wolff suggested that Epstein was likely involved in introducing Melania and Dementia Don. Well, Prince Andrew’s biographer Andrew Lownie said much the same, that there were all of these connections between Epstein, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump and Melania, and that his sources confirmed that Epstein was the one who introduced Donald and Melania. Well, that’s what Lownie initially wrote in his new book. But now that Melania is threatening everyone with $1 billion lawsuits, Lownie is removing that part of his book.

A new book about the Duke of York has been edited to remove a claim that Jeffrey Epstein introduced Donald Trump to his wife Melania. The allegation was published in around 60,000 copies of Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, by Andrew Lownie, which paints a damning portrait of Prince Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson.

The retractions are being made after Melania Trump threatened to sue Hunter Biden for claiming that paedophile financier Epstein introduced her to her future husband. Lawyers for the US first lady wrote to Mr Biden, the son of the former US president Joe Biden, accusing him of making “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements” about her. The letter, sent on Aug 6, is said to have demanded that Mr Biden retract his comments and issue an apology or face a $1bn (£726m) legal action.

Mr Trump said he had encouraged his wife to sue, insisting on Fox News Radio last week: “Jeffrey Epstein had nothing to do with Melania and introducing.” He added: “It was another person actually… but it wasn’t Jeffrey Epstein.”

Mr Lownie’s book made a similar claim, quoting allegations said to have been made by Epstein to an unidentified author in 2007. The passage will be deleted from future print editions, while the ebook and audiobooks have been updated to reflect the changes.

A HarperCollins UK spokesman told the Telegraph: “We can confirm that several passages from Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York by Andrew Lownie have been removed in consultation with the author. Entitled is published in the UK by HarperCollins. In the US, the book is self-published by Mr Lownie.”

[From The Telegraph]

Just days ago, Lownie also confirmed that he had to add some lines to the section about Prince Harry as well, because apparently Harry’s lawyers contacted HarperCollins. The Harry section – in which Lownie claims that Harry had a physical fight with Andrew, and that Andrew made disparaging remarks about Meghan – is not being removed from the book, Lownie simply added lines about how Harry has denied these stories. Anyway, this is all part of a larger discussion about Lownie’s book which I’ve been trying to have for weeks. While I think Prince Andrew is a degenerate lout and a nonce and I’ll always believe the worst about him, I also think Lownie has played fast-and-loose with a lot of these stories. The way he reacted to Prince Harry fact-checking him told me all I needed to know about his “sources.”

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Getty.

Categories
donald trump Jeffrey Epstein Melania Trump

Wolff: Melania Trump was ‘very involved’ with Jeffrey Epstein’s social circle

Embed from Getty Images

It’s genuinely crazy to watch MAGAville reckon with the fact that Donald Trump was a longtime associate and friend to Jeffrey Epstein. Much of what we’ve been hearing in the past month had already been widely reported or assumed by people following the Epstein case. Even back in Trump’s first term, there was an abundance of weird sh-t happening around Epstein’s rearrest, like the fact that Trump’s then-Attorney General was one of the first people to visit and speak to Epstein when he was taken into custody in 2019. Still, there’s at least one gossip/investigatory avenue which hasn’t been explored thoroughly: Melania Trump’s association with Epstein, and her associations with other men who were in Epstein’s sphere (including Trump) in the 1990s.

Longtime Trump biographer Michael Wolff says that First Lady Melania could be the missing link in President Donald Trump’s ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Wolff told Daily Beast Podcast host Joanna Coles that Melania was “very involved” in Epstein’s social circle and noted that this is how she met Trump.

“She’s introduced by a model agent, both of whom Trump and Epstein are involved with. She’s introduced to Trump that way. Epstein [knew] her well,” Wolff said.

Trump and the future first lady reportedly first met in September 1998 through Paolo Zampolli, the founder of ID Models, who helped Melania emigrate to the United States. Zampolli had ties to Epstein and his now-incarcerated partner in crime, Ghislaine Maxwell, Politico reported. In explosive tapes recorded by Wolff, Epstein alleged that Trump liked to “f—” his friends’ wives and first slept with Melania on his “Lolita Express.”

Since March 2025, Zampolli has served as Trump’s special representative for global partnerships. The MAGA loyalist has a giant oil painting of Trump in his $17 million Georgetown mansion.

“Where does [Melania] fit into the Epstein story? Where does she fit into this, into this whole culture of models of indeterminate age?” Wolff said. “So this is another complicated dimension in this.”

The Trump administration has faced intense media scrutiny over the Epstein case following a July 6 memo from the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation that found Epstein died by suicide while awaiting trial for sex trafficking charges in 2019 and that no “client list” of wealthy co-conspirators exists—the subject of endless conspiracy theories among Trump’s MAGA base. The findings have led Trump to lose some die-hard fans as his administration works to divert MAGA’s attention with National Security Adviser Tulsi Gabbard’s claims that the Obama administration engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy” to cook up intelligence on Russia to interfere with the 2016 election.

Sharing a two-page excerpt of her bestselling book, Melania, last week, the first lady refuted claims that Epstein had a hand in their introduction, writing in her book that she met Trump at New York’s Kit Kat Club.

Typically, the First Lady hides in the shadows, Wolff said. “She never is by his side,” Wolff told Coles. “All of those courtroom appearances that she shows up once, I report in my book that one of the aides approached her and she said, ‘Nice try,’ and then laughed.”

Reached for comment, White House Communications Director Steven Cheung blasted Wolff as a “fraud.”

“Michael Wolff is a lying sack of s–t and has been proven to be a fraud,” he said. “He routinely fabricates stories originating from his sick and warped imagination, only possible because he has a severe and debilitating case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has rotted his peanut-sized brain.”

[From The Daily Beast]

Can we just take a moment and acknowledge that it’s wild that a White House communications director regularly releases such deranged, angry and obscene statements and everyone just shrugs? Jake Tapper and CNN would have had the “breaking news” banner locked in for a full month if Biden’s comms director called a journalist a “lying sack of sh-t” on the record. As for Melania… going by Cheung’s statement, it looks like Wolff touched a nerve. I think both Melania and Bigly have always maintained that they met in a club, but Melania was absolutely trying to bag a rich husband, and I could see how people in Epstein’s circle likely facilitated the meeting.

#1 New York Times Bestseller, “Melania” ||

How I Met Donald Trump https://t.co/xIfkkmL4YC pic.twitter.com/ioDucDuo9A

— MELANIA TRUMP (@MELANIATRUMP) July 18, 2025

Photos courtesy of Cover Images & Getty.

Categories
Jeffrey Epstein Prince Andrew

Lownie: Jeffrey Epstein sold Prince Andrew’s intimate secrets to foreign governments

For years, people have known that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell absolutely had a “client list.” Which is why it’s so bizarre that the Trump administration claims that the client list doesn’t exist. The actual debate (to my mind) is who actually ran the operation, because from what we’ve heard from the survivors of the Epstein-Maxwell trafficking scheme, it was Maxwell telling the girls where to go and what to do with high-profile or wealthy men. But I believe Epstein was the one who kept the kompromat, the videos and actual receipts, and he might have been the one passing on intelligence gleaned from his “clients.” Well, in Andrew Lowne’s new book about Prince Andrew, Lowne’s sources claim that Epstein actually did sell Andrew’s secrets to the Israeli, Libyan and Saudi governments.

Jeffrey Epstein sold Prince Andrew’s “most intimate secrets” to foreign intelligence agencies around the world, a new book has claimed. Compromising material on the Duke of York is alleged to have been passed to Israel’s Mossad, the Saudi Arabian authorities and the Libyan intelligence services under Colonel Gaddafi.

Details of the claims are made in a new book on the prince, by author Andrew Lownie, which describes how the royal was easy prey for a “rattlesnake” like Epstein. Victims of the US billionaire, who took his own life in 2019, have claimed for years that Epstein kept video recordings of his high-profile friends having sex with women. No proof of any recordings has ever been made public.

Lownie, in his new book, credits a documentary by the Canadian journalist Ian Halperin as the source of allegations that Epstein sold Andrew’s secrets to foreign agencies in the Middle East and Libya. The claims were “confirmed” to Halperin by “many in Andrew’s circle”, Lownie wrote. Halperin wrote about Epstein in his own book, Controversy: Sex, Lies and Dirty Money by the World’s Powerful Elite, which was published on Amazon in 2020. In his book, Halperin claims that he spoke to Epstein in 2001 and quotes the financier at length as he discussed the Duke of York and the rest of the royal family. Epstein is quoted as telling Halperin that he had met Queen Elizabeth and introduced Princess Diana to Dodi Fayed, among other eyebrow-raising claims.

Lownie told The Times that he didn’t “buy everything” in Halperin’s Epstein book, but added that the information he had put into his own book had been “verified”. He said: “The claim about the kompromat, I’ve got it from other sources.”

In his book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, Lownie wrote that “other sources” alleged Epstein had Kremlin connections and may have been an “agent of influence” for Vladimir Putin. Epstein played Andrew, Lownie said. He wrote in his book: “The prince was a useful idiot who gave him respectability, access to political leaders and business opportunities. He found him easy to exploit.”

The book also quotes US businessman, and convicted fraudster, Steven Hoffenberg, who knew Epstein, as saying that Andrew was his “Super Bowl trophy” and Epstein planned to sell Andrew’s secrets to Mossad. Hoffenberg said: “Andrew had a weakness for the girls and fast life, Epstein provided that fantasy. Andrew would then give intelligence that Epstein would give to Israel. Andrew didn’t understand that he was being used.”

[From The Times]

Sure. As I’ve said before, I have no problem believing the worst of Prince Andrew and, for that matter, Epstein and Maxwell. This has long been the gossip/conspiracy about Epstein’s operation: that he provided girls to powerful men and gathered kompromat. That’s the conspiracy around Epstein and Trump’s relationship too, that Epstein and Trump shared the same proclivities and that Epstein had intelligence and evidence of Trump’s depravity, which he passed along/sold to foreign intelligence agencies. It would honestly explain a lot. And yes, I also believe that Andrew was a “useful idiot” being “run” by multiple governments and intelligence agencies. Epstein wasn’t the first nor the last to use Andrew’s oafish narcissism and depravity for his own means.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

Categories
donald trump Jeffrey Epstein

There was a mysterious ‘orange figure’ around Jeffrey Epstein’s jail cell before he died

Embed from Getty Images

When the Trump administration’s DOJ “closed” the Jeffrey Epstein case, all hell broke loose in all directions. One thread we’ve been following is the obvious cover-up around the investigation into Epstein’s death in custody in 2019. A few weeks ago, the FBI released what they called “raw footage” from outside of Epstein’s jail cell. There were immediate problems, as everyone could see that the footage was manipulated, selectively edited and missing an important chunk of time. Well, the FBI reportedly has the real, unedited footage and there’s a mysterious “orange shape” near Epstein’s jail cell in an important time frame.

Experts say there are flaws with the official explanation for why a shadowy figure moved in the direction of Jeffrey Epstein’s prison cell the night he died. A mysterious “orange shape” was recorded ascending the stairs to where Epstein’s cell was located, which federal investigators previously concluded was a corrections officer carrying up “linen or inmate clothing” on Epstein’s final night alive.

Conor McCourt, a retired NYPD sergeant and forensic video expert, told CBS News he disagrees with the conclusion reached by the DOJ’s Office of Inspector General.

“It’s more likely it’s a person in an [orange] uniform,” he said. More specifically, a person wearing an orange inmate jumpsuit. CBS reported that other forensics experts were also “skeptical” of the conclusion reached by federal investigators.

There is a great deal of importance in who—or what—that grainy orange figure is. It traveled up the stairs to Epstein’s cell block around 10:40 p.m. on Aug. 9, 2019, and is the last recorded movement in the direction of Epstein’s cell in the Metropolitan Correctional Center before his body was discovered by guards the next morning.

CBS reports that a second camera’s recording could provide crucial evidence, but is being withheld by investigators. It also noted that the corrections officers on duty failed to follow protocol that required check-ins every 30 minutes on Epstein, who was on suicide watch and temporarily had no cellmate.

The network reported that the staircase leading to Epstein’s cell block could be ascended without being recorded by a security camera, as the majority of the stairs are out of its view. CBS reported this contradicts claims by investigators and Trump officials, including Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino, who asserted that the security camera would have recorded anyone who walked up the stairs.

“To say that there’s no way that someone could get to that, the stairs up to his room, without being seen is false,” the video forensics expert Jim Stafford told CBS. Four other experts in the field reportedly agreed with Stafford’s assessment.

[From The Daily Beast]

In my opinion, the mysterious orange figure is likely another inmate, and I think that’s the most likely explanation if you do believe that there was something fishy about Epstein’s death. If someone else was involved, it was most likely someone already in the facility, whether that was another inmate or one of the guards. Given what we know about Epstein’s powerful associates, the likeliest explanation (if another person was involved) is certainly that someone already in the facility was paid/bribed/threatened to do the hit.

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Photos courtesy of Getty.