Categories
Taylor Swift

Taylor Swift released the music video for ‘The Fate of Ophelia’: thoughts?

While Taylor Swift’s The Life of a Showgirl has gotten positive-to-great reviews from a lot of legacy media, I don’t think I’ve ever seen Taylor’s fans more disappointed in one of her projects. Many Swifties forced themselves to swallow The Tortured Poets Department, hoping that it was just something Taylor needed to get out of her system because so much of it was about Matt Healy. To make matters worse, it looks like this album is full of interpolation and uncredited “inspiration” – including hooks, chord progressions and lyrics from Joe Jonas, Lana del Rey, the Pixies and the Jackson Five. Someone even pointed out that she plagiarized The 1975 as well.

Still, TLOAS is selling well, which is pretty much the only thing Taylor cares about. The album sold 2.7 million copies just on its first day of release. That’s Taylor’s biggest “opening day” sales ever. The only album which had bigger first-week sales is Adele’s 25. Taylor loves to work the charts and sales records too, which is why she’s already announced TLOAS variants in the form of limited-edition CDs with acoustic versions of the songs. And fresh cover images too.

Meanwhile, Taylor just released the music video for “The Fate of Ophelia” – while this is one of the better songs on TLOAS, the music video just leaves me cold? Taylor has forced this “showgirl” aesthetic onto a song and an album which has nothing to do with showgirls. Taylor wrote and directed this too, and you can tell. I’m also including a clip from Graham Norton below.

File this under “save your best for the finale”… I think my favorite moments from the tour were the acoustic surprises. So I went back into the studio with Max and Shellback to record acoustic/unplugged versions of a few of the Showgirl songs with brand new vocals and… pic.twitter.com/HyzpYnvSmz

— Taylor Swift (@taylorswift13) October 4, 2025

Screengrabs courtesy of The Graham Norton Show & Magic FM. Cover courtesy of Taylor’s social media.

Categories
Music Taylor Swift

Taylor Swift’s ‘The Life of a Showgirl’ is getting mostly positive reviews

Taylor Swift’s The Life of a Showgirl is out now. The good news is that Taylor is a stand-alone industry and a monoculture, which means that everyone has an opinion on her life and her music. On Thursday, leaks of TLOAS were being widely circulated online, and the Swifties were already in the trenches and fighting with everyone. The thing is, 90% of the music industry is in awe of Taylor and fearful of her enormous power. Which probably explains why even though early listeners of TLOAS are disappointed, the mainstream media’s reviews of the album are glowing and extremely positive. Variety and Rolling Stone led the way in praising the album and calling it yet another perfect classic. The Guardian’s critic was more honest, and this is the review getting much more play, some highlights:

There are albums for which vast success seems preordained, and then there is The Life of a Showgirl. The podcast on which Taylor Swift announced the release of her 12th studio album – her fiance Travis Kelce’s ordinarily sports-focused New Heights – garnered half a billion views, breaking a record set by Donald Trump’s appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience in the process. A “launch event” film, featuring the kind of lyric videos and backstage footage that anyone else would release on YouTube, is instead set for a theatrical release in more than 100 countries: in the US alone, it sold $15m worth of tickets in 24 hours. The album itself has been pre-saved more than 5m times on Spotify, breaking another record in the process. “I’m immortal now,” Swift sings on the title track, which seems less like an extravagant boast than a statement of fact.

In contrast to last year’s The Tortured Poets Department – which by the time she’d finished releasing expanded editions and bonus tracks, was nearly two and half hours long – it offers a crisp 12 songs in 40 minutes. Her recent collaborators Jack Antonoff and Aaron Dessner are nowhere to be seen. Swift made The Life of a Showgirl in between Eras dates with Max Martin and Shellback, the Swedish duo who co-wrote and produced her most forthright pop bangers of the 2010s: Shake It Off, Blank Space, Don’t Blame Me, Bad Blood.

But anyone anticipating something similar from Showgirl is in for a shock: the fizzing electronic pop of Reputation and 1989 is conspicuously absent. Instead, its primary currency is breezy, easy-on-the-ear soft rock: acoustic guitars, misty synth tones, subtle orchestrations and breathy backing vocals. Wood’s laid-back take on disco recalls not the sweaty hedonism of the dancefloor but the late 70s moment where four-to-floor rhythms and chicken-scratch guitar temporarily invaded the oeuvres of west coast singer-songwriters.

More startling still is the distinct lack of undeniable hooks and nailed-on melodies. The songs are well turned, but in terms of genuinely memorable moments, Showgirl evinces just one killer chorus (Elizabeth Taylor), some impressively unexpected key changes on Wi$h Li$t and the authentically heart-tugging Ruin the Friendship, which finds Swift returning to her home town for the funeral of a high school boy she regrets not dating. There’s a fantastic chord sequence on Actually Romantic, but, alas, 37 years ago Frank Black wrote a very similar one for Where Is My Mind? by Pixies, a song you can literally sing along to Actually Romantic. The rest floats in one ear and out the other: not unpleasantly, but you might reasonably expect more given the amassed songwriting firepower behind it, and Swift’s claims of “keeping the bar really high”.

Cancelled! deals with the Kim-and-Kanye-adjacent controversies that beset Swift in 2015 and 2016, and Father Figure concerns former label boss Scott Borchetta, both in needless-to-say-I-had-the-last-laugh style. There are some spiky lines here and there – “you made a deal with this devil / turns out my dick’s bigger” snaps Father Figure – but they don’t really click. Perhaps that’s because Cancelled! and Father Figure revisit very well-trodden ground, while eviscerating a rival when you’re the world’s most successful pop star is, by default, punching down, even if she did apparently call you “boring Barbie” behind your back.

Then there’s Wood, a song that, metaphorically speaking, drunkenly clambers on a table in Wetherspoons pub with a skew-whiff bridal veil on its head and an L-plate around its neck and favours everyone in earshot with a loud paean to the size of her fiance’s penis, which it variously describes as his “magic wand”, his “redwood tree” and his “hard rock” (there is also a regrettable degree of punning on the word “cocky”). Of course, Swift is perfectly entitled to write about whatever she wants, TMI or not, but there’s no escaping the fact that comparing her partner’s knob to a magic wand constitutes weak writing from someone who made her name, at least in part, by being a sharper, wittier, more incisive lyricist than her peers.

In fairness, Wood is one clanging misstep on an album that isn’t terrible: it’s just nowhere near as good as it should be given Swift’s talents, and it leaves you wondering why. Perhaps romantic contentment simply writes whiter than vengeful post-breakup bitterness, or perhaps it wobbles your judgment. Perhaps it was rushed. Or perhaps its author was just exhausted, which would be entirely understandable. Even the immortal, it seems, sometimes need to take a break from pop’s constant churn and unceasing clamour for content.

[From The Guardian]

The fact that it’s not full of more revved-up songs is what surprised me, given the name of the album and Taylor’s return to working with Max Martin and Shellback. I was expecting upbeat pop bangers, and not… this. I also don’t understand Taylor’s need to churn out albums every year, especially when it certainly feels like she’s running out of good material. That’s the larger point though – Taylor’s in such rarefied air, she believes/knows that her fans will buy every single song, every album, every variant she sells, regardless of quality. Every artist makes dumb songs – very few artists release all of their dumb songs because they feel the need to churn out an annual album. I’m including some reactions below, and Taylor’s new IG post full of Showgirl pics.

oh my god???? pic.twitter.com/729fJfeZhN

— Bil (@KillingSwiftly) October 3, 2025

lol https://t.co/a78pUaSvCU pic.twitter.com/quyrERr07R

— grace spelman (@GraceSpelman) October 3, 2025

you know what? maybe joe alwyn did write some songs on folklore

— m ???? (@taylorswiftliar) October 3, 2025

miss showgirl thinks she’s Kendrick Lamar but in reality she’s the dean of the English department at Lea Michele university

— Carrie Wittmer ???? (@carriesnotscary) October 2, 2025

Photos courtesy of Taylor Swift’s IG and screencaps courtesy of Magic FM.

Categories
Charli XCX Taylor Swift

Is Taylor Swift’s ‘Actually Romantic’ about Charli XCX’s ‘Sympathy Is a Knife’?

Just like The Tortured Poets Department, Taylor Swift’s The Life of a Showgirl leaked online a few days before the album’s official release. People quickly became focused on one particular song, “Actually Romantic.” The first lines of the song: “I heard you call me “Boring Barbie”/when the coke’s got you brave/High-fived my ex and then you said you’re glad he ghosted me/Wrote me a song saying it makes you sick to see my face/Some people might be offended/But it’s actually sweet/All the time you’ve spent on me/It’s honestly wild/All the effort you’ve put in/It’s actually romantic.”

The backstory: Taylor used to date Matt Healy, the lead singer of The 1975. Charli XCX dated and is now married to George Daniel, drummer of The 1975. Charli and Taylor were around each other briefly because of that. Charli referenced that in the song “Sympathy Is a Knife” on her album Brat, which came out last year. The lyrics to “SIAK” include: “I don’t wanna share this space/I don’t wanna force a smile/This one girl taps my insecurities/Don’t know if it’s real or if I’m spiraling” and “’Cause I couldn’t even be her if I tried/I’m opposite, I’m on the other side.”

Charli’s song is about her own insecurities, and comparing herself unfavorably to Taylor. Charli’s message last year was very clear, and she even spelled it out in interviews and social media, that most of Brat was about not feeling good enough, comparing herself to other pop stars, and feeling societal pressure to both compete with other pop girls and be besties with other pop girls. And Taylor took that as a diss track and called Charli a cokehead. Is it possible that Taylor just… didn’t understand “SIAK”? Possibly. Is it also possible that Charli and Taylor had beef beyond “SIAK,” beef about Matt Healy? Probably. Charli is close to Healy’s fiancee, and I could absolutely see how Taylor is in her feelings about the Matt Healy of it all.

Incidentally, last year, Lorde understood the assignment. Lorde heard Charli’s “girl, so confusing” and she didn’t take it as a diss track or anything. Lorde immediately hopped on the remix, and it turned into the best song to come out of the Brat Era, with both Charli and Lorde owning their own insecurities and Lorde telling Charli that of course she still rides for her.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, cover courtesy of TS.

Categories
Taylor Swift Travis Kelce

Taylor Swift & Travis Kelce went to Patrick Mahomes’s b-day party on Sunday

Did you guys know that both Brittany and Patrick Mahomes are Virgos? That’s so interesting to me, you rarely see dual-Virgo marriages out in the wild, especially among celebrities. Brittany’s birthday is August 31, and Patrick’s b-day is September 17th. Taylor Swift went to some of Brittany’s b-day festivities in Nashville several weeks ago, and now it appears that Taylor went to a smallish birthday party for Patrick. This party happened on Sunday night, after the Eagles beat the Kansas City Chiefs. Country singer Kane Brown was there, and he posted a photo of the Mahomeses along with Travis Kelce and Taylor. This was the only sighting of Taylor on Sunday, because even though she attended the Chiefs game, she hid behind a barrier on her way to the VIP box, and she also hid from broadcasters during the game. TMZ now says that Taylor hid away because of security issues, which is what I figured.

Taylor Swift snuck into a football stadium to watch her fiancé Travis Kelce at work … and it looks like she used a bullet-resistant portable shield to evade detection following Charlie Kirk’s very public murder. Swifties are running with an interesting theory online after Taylor kept an extremely low profile at Sunday’s game between Travis’ Kansas City Chiefs and the Philadelphia Eagles … her fans think she was behind a bulletproof barrier that was seen rolling through the bowels of Arrowhead Stadium in K.C.

We did some digging and it seems the barrier being used here is a bullet-resistant portable shield partition that retails for about $6,000.

Taylor usually makes high-profile arrivals to Arrowhead to watch Travis play … with tons of video typically showing her making her way to her suite. That didn’t happen Sunday and it’s unclear why she seemingly felt the need to sneak in behind a protective barrier. It will be interesting to see if Taylor keeps this up … the screen may be bad luck though … the Chiefs lost, 20-17, to drop to 0-2 on the season.

[From TMZ]

This isn’t the first time that Taylor’s security has had to turn on a dime because of some larger national issue. During her Eras Tour, she had to cancel her Vienna concerts because of a terrorist plot. The past week has been absolutely insane, and I would assume that Taylor’s private security is being inundated with credible threats. I actually wonder if Taylor is going to make a point of skipping Chiefs games for a little while, at least until things cool down.

Photos courtesy of Kane Brown’s Instagram, Taylor’s IG and Cover Images.

Categories
Taylor Swift Travis Kelce

Taylor Swift attended the Eagles-Chiefs game but hid behind a huge screen

Something really weird happened last night. While no one was paying any attention to the Emmys, football season was in full swing. The Eagles played the Chiefs at Arrowhead Stadium, in a rematch of the Super Bowl earlier this year. The Eagles once again beat the Chiefs, and Travis Kelce is being blasted for screwing up a pass or something (I magically still don’t know anything about football). Travis was really upset, and he was screaming and throwing his helmet. People were really going in on him online.

So, that was weird, but so is this: Taylor Swift was allegedly there, but no one caught sight of her and there were no photos or cutaways to her during the game. For the past two football seasons, Taylor is a regular at games played at Arrowhead. She and her team work with Arrowhead security, and there’s almost always a little “stroll” in one of the stadium’s corridors where a couple of photographers can get pics of her outfit. As I said, that’s been the case for two years. But this year, for the Chiefs’ first home game of the season, Taylor didn’t do that. She apparently hid behind a screen on her way to the VIP box. Which… okay, maybe she didn’t feel like being photographed like that anymore. But they didn’t get any photos of her in the VIP box either?? What’s going on? People Mag swears that she was there, so I guess she just watched her fiance’s team lose from deep inside the VIP box.

People are immediately going with “pregnant.” Possibly, but I think there’s a much better chance that this was completely about her security. Taylor showed up late, mid-game as well.

I’m not a Taylor Swift fan. However, she has freely walked in and out of chief games no problem. Now she’s engaged to Travis Kelce. So why would they need to block people from seeing her? Enter or exit the game? I will tell you. She’s probably pregnant. @taylorswift13pic.twitter.com/uSVO26AyGP

— Just Joe (@joeyjo35t) September 15, 2025

????| Better look at Taylor Swift arriving at the Chiefs game, hidden behind a wall. pic.twitter.com/PyM4BuqfTF

— The Swift Society (@TheSwiftSociety) September 14, 2025

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

Categories
Taylor Swift Travis Kelce

People: Taylor Swift & Travis Kelce’s wedding ‘will definitely be a private affair’

After the first rush of excitement and buzz about Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s engagement, it actually felt like they’re trying to lower the temperature a little bit. For the past week, there’s been a consistent thread of stories in the vein of “Taylor and Travis are not going to have a big wedding” and “this isn’t going to be a splashy affair.” According to Travis – on last week’s New Heights pod – he and Tay haven’t started planning anything yet, and I would imagine they’re still looking at their schedules and they’re stuck on “when” and perhaps “where.” Well, in case you needed to hear it from People Magazine, that’s what their cover story is all about.

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce may have shared their engagement news with the world, but their actual wedding won’t be a such a public affair. A source tells PEOPLE in this week’s issue that the pop star and the Kansas City Chiefs tight end “want to keep it more private” when they tie the knot.

“It will definitely be a private affair and not a spectacle,” the source says. “They both have a close circle of friends, and they’ll respect their privacy.”

Swift and Kelce, both 35, announced their engagement on Instagram on Aug. 26 after two years of dating, sharing sweet photos from the proposal with the caption, “Your English teacher and your gym teacher are getting married.” Kelce popped the question with an old mine brilliant cut diamond — a ring the source says Swift is “still showing off.”

“She’s incredibly happy,” the source adds. “It’s all just perfect.”

As for wedding planning, the couple are taking things one step at a time. Kelce said on New Heights that he hasn’t thought for “one second” about a bachelor party, but promised that it’s “gonna go crazy” when they do get to wedding planning. “That,” he said, “is the next step.”

[From People]

One more word about the ring – what impressed me was not the size, cut or price tag. What impressed me was that Travis knows and understands Taylor’s taste. It looks like the kind of ring she would have picked out for herself. Which is the real prize for Taylor and for all women: to be known, to have someone who understands us and knows our preferences and tastes. As for the wedding planning… I’d love a spectacle worthy of their level of celebrity, but yeah, I don’t think Taylor would want that. I really hope we get to see her dress though, because I feel like that’s going to be THE most princessy wedding gown ever.

Photos courtesy of Taylor’s IG, Backgrid and People Mag.

Categories
Brittany Mahomes Taylor Swift

Taylor Swift partied with Brittany Mahomes in Nashville for Brittany’s 30th b-day

Y’all, wait?? Brittany Mahomes is only 30 years old? Why did I think she was in her late 30s? Brittany celebrated her 30th birthday this week, meaning she’s a Virgo. Brittany had a girl-squad b-day party in Nashville, and she invited Taylor Swift. Taylor came for the party, or one of the parties. It doesn’t look like Taylor stuck around for very long though – just a brief appearance, drop off a gift, take a couple of photos and have a glass of wine, then Tay got out of there.

Last year, there was a larger conversation about Taylor’s politics and Brittany’s politics and all of that. Like, Taylor was blamed for normalizing or accepting Brittany’s MAGA lunacy. I felt a bit sorry for Taylor, because to me, it looks like she’s being nice to the wife of her fiance’s closest work colleague. Of course, I also think Taylor doesn’t mind hanging out with Brittany, but make no mistake, they’ve barely seen each other in months and their friendship seems scheduled around football season.

One nice thing I’ll say about Brittany is that it seems like she has a core group of girlfriends and it also looks like she “treated” them to her lavish, multi-day birthday celebrations. It’s interesting to see Taylor as the “third wheel” in someone else’s clique. That’s probably why Taylor skedaddled pretty quickly.

Photos courtesy of Brittany’s IG and Cover Images.