Categories
Controversies Scandals

A Polish CEO stole a tennis player’s hat from a child at the US Open

This year’s US Open has been nonstop drama. Welcome to New York, I guess. Last week, a Polish tennis player named Kamil Majchrzak won his second-round match on Court 11 of the Billie Jean King Center. The smaller courts, like Court 11, allow for tennis fans to get up close and personal with players, and winning players will often spend several minutes after their matches, talking to fans and signing tennis balls. Majchrzak did just that – before he left the court, he stopped to sign balls for a group of kids waiting in the front row of the stands. Kamil removed his sweaty baseball cap and tried to hand it to one of the kids. For tennis fans, a hat, headband, tennis racquet or wristband from a player is basically the holy grail. Before the kid could even take the hat, an adult man snatched the hat away from the child.

Two things happened after this. One, Kamil came off court and someone showed him the video, because he didn’t realize what happened as he was autographing balls. Kamil was like, oh, that’s so wrong, so he basically asked social media to help him find the kid so that Kamil could give him another hat. Kamil succeeded – within 24 hours, they tracked down the kid and Kamil gave the kid a hat and some other gifts, plus a photo and a nice memory. The second thing that happened was social media was outraged about that hat-snatching douchebag, so everyone went searching for HIS identity. They found him, and as the newscaster said in the video above, the guy is a Polish executive/millionaire who threatened to sue people for calling him an a–hole on the internet. Hilariously, after everyone yelled at the CEO, he issued an apology and lied about how he thought Kamil was handing him the hat.

???? Quand un pauvre enfant se fait voler la casquette offerte par Majchrzak ! ????#USOpen #HomeOfTennis pic.twitter.com/b1sMb83Wq8

— Eurosport France (@Eurosport_FR) August 29, 2025

Polish millionaire CEO who snatched a hat meant for a child on live TV at the US Open speaks out.

“Yes, I took it. Yes, I did it quickly. But as I’ve always said, life is first come, first served… If you were faster, you would have it… I remind you that insulting a public… pic.twitter.com/lEaX9BxkPJ

— FearBuck (@FearedBuck) August 31, 2025

“The kid can get his hat back, but can he get his innocence back?” ????

A man snatching Kamil Majchrzak’s hat away from a kid at the US Open has gone viral. ????#TCLive | #USOpen pic.twitter.com/EegqA0i2PC

— Tennis Channel (@TennisChannel) August 30, 2025

Photos courtesy of Kamil’s IG.

Categories
Controversies Mark Zuckerberg Real Estate

Mark Zuckerberg’s Palo Alto neighbors fed up with takeover, ‘constant construction’




Would it surprise you to learn that Mark Zuckerberg is a bad neighbor? Yeah, me neither. Still, I appreciate The New York Times for their recent breakdown of the specific havoc he’s causing the community in one of the four (and counting) cities where he owns residential property. Crescent Park is an affluent neighborhood of Palo Alto and three miles away from Meta HQ, making it a logical home base for Zuckerberg. He bought his first home there in 2011, which happened to be the oldest house in Palo Alto, according to the local heritage society. Since then, Zuckerberg has shelled out over $110 million on 10 additional homes, five of which have been converted/connected into one giant compound where he and wife Priscilla Chan live with their three kids as their primary residence. Dare I say, it’s their “forever home.” But building the compound of your dreams in real life doesn’t materialize as quickly as an AI-generated image. So, much to Crescent Park’s chagrin, it’s been eight years of noisy, disruptive, constant construction.

Chez Zuck: The property features guest homes, gardens, a pickleball court, a pool with a hydrofloor covering and even a 7-foot silver statue of Chan, 40, commissioned by Zuckerberg. Underneath the compound, the tech executive added 7,000 square feet of what was referred to as basement space in permits, but neighbors call it bunkers or the billionaire’s bat cave. Elsewhere, one of the properties has been used as a private school for 14 children, despite city code prohibiting it. … A spokesperson for Zuckerberg’s family told the Times that they didn’t realize they were violating code and instead characterized the school as a kind of homeschooling pod formed after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The spokesman said the kids did not pay tuition.

A neighborhood under occupation: Speaking to the Times, nine neighbors, seven of whom asked not to be identified out of fear of retribution, described eight years of constant construction, blocked driveways, debris and even car mirrors broken off by equipment. They also spoke about increased levels of surveillance throughout the neighborhood, including newly installed security cameras and security guards sitting in cars. “No neighborhood wants to be occupied,” Michael Kieschnick, a Palo Alto resident whose home shares three sides with property owned by Zuckerberg, told the outlet. “But that’s exactly what they’ve done. They’ve occupied our neighborhood.”

Et tu, Palo Alto? In 2016, a city board rejected his application to build a compound. But over time, the city has approved 56 permits for Zuckerberg’s properties, allowing him to slowly build it. Neighbors also alleged the police department recently posted signs creating a tow-away zone on a public road for five hours. Kieschnick later learned it was for a backyard barbecue hosted by the CEO. “Billionaire’s everywhere are used to just making their own rules — Zuckerberg and Chan are not unique, except that they’re our neighbors,” Kieschnick added. “But it’s a mystery why the city has been so feckless.” Kieschnick told the Times he’s been approached by Zuckerberg’s team with an offer to buy his home of more than 30 years. But his answer is no.

The Zuckerbergs’ spox strike back: “They value being members of the community and have taken a number of steps above and beyond any local requirements to avoid disruption in the neighborhood.” According to the representative, staff, vendors and crews are frequently reminded to minimize noise and they are encouraged to carpool or taxi to and from the property. … To accommodate the neighbors, the couple has made some changes. The Times reports security guards now sit in quiet electric vehicles. His staff has also sent gifts to the neighbors when things have gotten out of hand, including sparkling wine, chocolates, Krispy Kreme doughnuts and even noise-canceling headphones.

[From People]

Michael Kieschnick is my new hero! Not only does he have the balls to go on record by name with the NY Times and refuse to sell his home to the billionaire, but he flawlessly used the word “feckless,” a label that Palo Alto has genuinely earned in this case. Keep up the good fight, Kieschnick! (Note to city auditors: a look into how many gifts of noise-canceling headphones Palo Alto has accepted over the past 10 years may be in order.) As for Zuck, what is it with billionaires building compounds?! Not to mention, why does he need this one in CA and the 1,600-acre one in Kauai that he kicked native Hawaiians off their land to build? The NY Times article — which has great graphics for getting a visual sense of the takeover — brought up that another reason Crescent Park residents are angry is that Zuck could have just as easily built his compound in a town nearby with more space, instead of plunking himself down in the middle of an established community and tearing down historic homes. But I guess it’s too late now; like they say, home is where the seven-foot-tall sculpture of your wife is. And hey, free Krispy Kremes from the billionaire!

Embed from Getty Images

My latest: Mark Zuckerberg has turned part of Palo Alto into a compound, buying at least eleven houses and adding a 7,000-square ft basement, pool with hydro floor and 7-foot statue of his wife.

After eight years of construction, neighbors are steamed. https://t.co/63TNwl9AoI

— Heather Knight (@hknightsf) August 10, 2025

Photos via Instagram

Categories
Controversies

MAGAts are throwing a tantrum over Cracker Barrel’s redesigned logo

Real talk: I enjoy Cracker Barrel. Cracker Barrel has good Southern food at affordable prices. Does Cracker Barrel’s vibe and interior also give off a vibe of “the South shall rise again?” Yes. It absolutely does. But damn, they make good corn and chicken-fried steak. Well, there’s been a lot of talk about Cracker Barrel this week because of a logo change. The old logo used to actually feature an old white guy and a barrel, which is pretty self-explanatory iconography for a restaurant chain called Cracker Barrel. Well, over the past year, the chain has been undergoing a redesign of their logo and their interiors. They’re Millennial-greying everything and removing all of the “character.” They’re clearly trying to make Cracker Barrel look less like a place which might feature a “whites only” sign. Well, everything has come to a head this week because MAGA is trying to make this into their new culture war.

Restaurant chain Cracker Barrel lost $94 million in market value just days after releasing a new logo that has become rage-bait for MAGA. Their stock plummeted on Thursday, according to CBS News, with shares falling over 7 percent to $54.80. The stock fell to a low of $50.27 earlier in the day. In May, the company’s third quarter revenue was $821.1 million.

Last year, Cracker Barrel announced a $700 million transformation plan, which included updating the decor at their chain of restaurants, enhancing the menu and keeping core customers while also finding new ones. The plan included refining the brand, although tweaking their trademark logo by removing the elderly man and his barrel has been a divisive move for conservatives, with Donald Trump Jr. posting on X, “WTF is wrong with Cracker Barrel??!”

The rebranded logo with text only launched on Tuesday. The company stated it was a return to the original text-only logo when the chain launched in 1969. As well as the 658 Cracker Barrel stores in 44 states, the company owns 68 Maple Street Biscuit Company stores in 10 states. In June, CEO Julie Massino said tariffs on goods imported for its retail shops would cost the company $5 million in the fourth quarter of 2025. The Daily Beast has contacted Cracker Barrel for comment.

[From The Daily Beast]

I honestly get why the right-wing believes that this is some kind of politics-tinged culture war, because Cracker Barrel, as it exists in the American zeitgeist, is absolutely white-Southern-Republican-coded. That’s probably WHY CB corporate decided to rebrand, to make everything more inclusive and to make the restaurants look like they fully accept non-hillbilly customers. It’s also a generational shift in general – we no longer have colorful McDonald’s franchises with play areas, we no longer have have rocking Pizza Huts with faux-Tiffany pendant lamps, and it’s why all of this suburban chain restaurants are trying to bland-down their vibes to appeal to more customers. But again, Democrats didn’t have anything to do with this! I swear! I’m a huge Democrat and I f–k with Cracker Barrel and I don’t mind the Southern vibe either.

We think the Cracker Barrel rebrand sucks too pic.twitter.com/XSzZcVQVd0

— Democrats (@TheDemocrats) August 21, 2025

For everyone whining about Cracker Barrel—remember this: when Joe Biden left office, the old logo was still there. It was Trump’s weakness that let the change happen.

Never would’ve happened under 46. pic.twitter.com/L19KzdCZW8

— Chris D. Jackson (@ChrisDJackson) August 21, 2025

Side-by-side logos, made by Celebitchy. Background image credit Brandon Ricketts on Pexels. Additional photo courtesy of Backgrid.

Categories
Controversies food Nicholas Sparks

Nicholas Sparks defends making chicken salad with 8 packets of Splenda




Prolific author Nicholas Sparks has made a fruitful career out of penning romance novels that have been made into big screen adaptations. He’s just churned out a new tale, Counting Miracles, that Amazon is already making into a movie. To promote his 22nd book, Sparks had a little piece in The New York Times, which ended up breaking news over his chicken salad recipe. What, pray tell, could be controversial about chicken salad, arguably the blandest of all deli salads? Adding 8 packets of Splenda to it, that’s what! I guess we really shouldn’t be surprised: the man writes overly saccharine stories, why should his salads be any different? Still, people are startled by this sacrilege to the salad arts:

The bestselling author behind The Notebook, A Walk to Remember, The Last Song and Dear John — all of which were later adapted into feature films — shared his personal spin on the culinary classic, which typically includes a combination of chicken, mayonnaise and various fruits and vegetables.

While Sparks’ variation included notable customizations like jalapenos and cayenne pepper, he also revealed that his recipe called for one particularly eye-catching ingredient: 16 packets of Splenda sweetener, equivalent to ⅔ cup of sugar.

“You can use real sugar,” the romance novelist — whose new book Counting Miracles is available now — told the New York Times in a profile published Sept. 24, “but why throw sugar in if you can use Splenda?”

The low-carb modification quickly sparked a wave of strong reactions on social media, ranging from intrigued to bewildered. One X (formerly Twitter) user wrote, “Some recipes really leave you questioning everything about a person.”

“As a true chicken salad connoisseur,” another wrote, “this is sociopathy.”

While another user called the amount of Splenda in the recipe “wild,” they were more concerned with the logistics of using individual packets to prepare the dish.

“At that point why are you still using individual packets of Splenda?” the user wondered. “Invest in a full box! Nicholas Sparks is wasting so much time fiddling around ripping each packet open!”

Sparks, 58, eventually caught wind of the social media reaction to his recipe and posted a video response to the “hubbub” on Instagram Sept. 27. In the video, the author stood by his controversial recipe, pointing out that the sweetener makes up for his use of a sugar-free mayonnaise.

“Why put sugar in stuff if you don’t need it?” he wondered. “The depth of flavor in this chicken salad is truly out of this world.”

He added, “All those who are picking on my Splenda-sweetened chicken salad, you’re missing out.”

[From E! News]

Reading his clapback is one thing, but when I actually watched Sparks’ response on Instagram he came off more like Nicholas Snarks. [Pause for laughter] And it’s not just the tone of his voice — he spends the video eating his chicken salad out of a wine glass!! With packets of Splenda artfully placed in the foreground, likely by a food stylist who worked diligently to make it look casual. My personal favorite comment on his post was someone who said, “this is why other nations hate us!” And though I’m loath to throw him a (wish)bone, I do feel compelled to note that Sparks includes the full recipe in the same Insta post, and he claims to use only 8 packets of Splenda, as opposed to the 16 the NY Times printed. I think the logical assumption is that he must have been whipping up a double batch when the NY Times was there? Still, I have to agree with those in an uproar about him using packets instead of a larger container. So unless and until he offers an explanation to the contrary, I choose to believe (and loudly spread the rumor) that Sparks is stealing his entire supply of the sugar substitute from diners and coffee shops. Prove me wrong, Nick!

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Categories
Controversies Olympics

Olympics organizers deny that they were referencing The Last Supper

Embed from Getty Images


Last week when we were speculating on who might perform at the first-ever outdoor Olympics opening ceremony, I blithely said, “I hope it doesn’t rain on the parade!” I should have known better than to jinx it. So, I humbly apologize to the Paris Olympics for however much my comment contributed to the first rainy summer games opening ceremony since 1952. The segment I found most nerve wracking to watch in the rain was the runway show. But while I was gasping “Gosh I hope no one slips and falls while walking in those fashion stilts high heels,” small-minded zealots were crying “Sacrilège!” Pourquoi? Apparently, those viewers thought the performers — a group that included drag queens and transgender models — were meant to look like da Vinci’s “The Last Supper.” Only they got their religious reference wrong, as the Olympics organizers have confirmed the scene was about Greek god of festivities Dionysus, who’s the father of Sequana, goddess of the river Seine, over which the festivities were taking place. So that quelled the brouhaha? Quelle surprise, those who were offended are committed to remaining offended. Mon dieu…

The direction was pagan, not Christian! While intended to raise awareness “of the absurdity of violence between human beings,” according to the organizers, it struck a sour note with religious groups worldwide. Reacting to the controversy over the weekend, the Olympics and Paralympics’ artistic director Thomas Jolly denied that “The Last Supper” even served as a reference in an interview with French outlet BFMTV. Instead, Jolly said the idea was to “have a grand pagan festival connected to the gods of Olympus. … It was pretty clear, is It is Dionysus who arrives at the table. Why is he there? Because Dionysus is the Greek god of festivities (…) and wine, and is the father of Sequana, the goddess of the Seine river,” he said.

A carefully worded apology: Anne Descamps, spokesperson for Paris 2024, told reporters at a press conference that “clearly there was never an intention to show disrespect to any religious group. … We believe this ambition was achieved. If people have taken any offense we are really sorry,” per AP.

Among those upset? Catholic Church officials, Viktor Orban, & Mike Johnson: The Catholic Church in France didn’t mince words, stating it “deplored a ceremony that included scenes of derision and mockery of Christianity.” The controversy even reached the Vatican, with Archbishop Charles Scicluna contacting France’s ambassador to Malta to complain about the “gratuitous insult,” according to The Guardian. The backlash wasn’t limited to religious circles. Political figures also weighed in, with Italy’s far-right leader Matteo Salvini describing the segment as “squalid,” and Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban speaking of the “moral void of the west,” The Guardian reported. Mike Johnson, speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, also did not pull his punches. Posting on X, Johnson described the tableau as a “mockery of the ‘Last Supper’” that was “shocking and insulting to Christian people around the world.”

‘Diversity means being together’: Jolly defended the concept. “We wanted to talk about diversity. Diversity means being together. We wanted to include everyone, as simple as that,” he said.

The organizers stand by their work: Maud Le Pladec, the choreographer of the opening ceremony and head of dance on the other Olympics and Paralympics ceremonies, told Variety that she, Jolly and the rest of the team, started working on the creation of this ceremony in January 2023 and “hadn’t imagined what happened with the rise of the far right. … We’re not psychic,” she says. … “When the far right lost out, I thought to myself that this opening ceremony was prophetic because its message is that after all the tumults, France ends up uniting all those who love each other, and that was our ultimate message: to love and understand each other regardless of differences. That’s why we ended with [Edith Piaf’s] ‘Hymne à l’Amour’ (sang by Celine Dion). It was a healing ceremony. That’s our France.”

[From Variety]

This is why we need to heed VP Harris’s words and vote to protect drag queens! And diversity and inclusion and free speech. And since the organizers have unequivocally explained what the reference actually was, can we please reframe the outrage? Instead of indignation that it’s an affront to Christianity, I’d like to see the headlines start reading, “Conservative Snowflakes Besmirch Classic Pagan Tableau!” #JusticeForDionysus! Incidentally, I have a ring from my late father that’s a carving of Dionysus’ head; I will be wearing it in solidarity with the performers and directors. Vive la révolution!

I found the choreographer’s comments at the end especially moving. The way the left wing came together in France to keep out Marine Le Pen & Co, it was unbelievably swift and hugely encouraging to watch unfold. It feels like we’re suddenly on the same trajectory in the US, of “uniting all those who love each other.” (I know, a lot can happen in three months.) What also touched me about those closing thoughts was how as a directing team, they viewed the whole program as a healing ceremony, which is why they chose to close with Celine Dion singing “Hymne à l’Amour.” Considering how it was a personal triumph for her, returning after battling illness, who else but Celine could have carried that moment of healing?

Some are angry about the “anti-Christian depiction of the last supper” at the Olympic Opening ceremony. (@elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump among others)

A Dutch art historian explains it’s not the last supper but a Dutch painting of the Olympic gods.

And I explain what I loved.

???? pic.twitter.com/ZMftlt7dTO

— AukeHoekstra (@AukeHoekstra) July 28, 2024

Beware of misinterpretation! The director of the opening ceremony of the @Paris2024 Games, Thomas Jolly, confirms that this scene was NOT a representation of the Christian Last Supper but a pagan feast, as evidenced by the presence of Dionysus -the Greek god of feasting and wine. pic.twitter.com/F5MYUBZqvz

— Jean-Baptiste Jeangène Vilmer (@jeangene_vilmer) July 28, 2024

Categories
Controversies Kids

A ‘Meet Bluey’ event at a Las Vegas hot dog restaurant was so bad little kids cried




We have another entry into the Marketing Disaster Hall of Fame. This time, it involves a Las Vegas hot dog restaurant and the beloved TV show Bluey. Last weekend, Dirt Dog decided to hold a “Bluey Day.” Bluey Day was supposed to have face painting, games, giveaways, treats, and a chance to meet Bluey herself. It sounds like a great idea, right? We’ve been to a couple of “Meet the Paw Patrol” events at local McDonald’s or fire stations or whatever, and they were always cute, with fun activities and the chance to potentially scare the sh-t out of your kids by giving them the opportunity to meet giant versions of Chase and Marshall in real life.

Except, that’s not exactly what went down at Dirt Dog. Someone there didn’t do their homework and planned an event for a small crowd, only to have hundreds of families show up. The giveaways and food ran out quickly, which is bad enough for a children’s event, but that wasn’t the worst part. The worst/most hilariously unfortunate part of this entire debacle was Bluey herself. The blue half of the Heeler sisters was played by a male employee dressed up in a Bluey hooded onesie. I’m having a hard time even typing this without laughing. They could even see his beard, hahahaha. Okay, I’ll stop laughing, because some kids did cry.

A Las Vegas hot dog restaurant apparently brought the wrath of hundreds, if not thousands, of fans of the animated Australian pooch down on their own heads this week, after announcing a free “Bluey Day” at their restaurant without understanding the series of events that their careless actions had so thoughtlessly set in motion.

Per a report from local news station Fox 5 (and as reported by SFGate), proprietors of the Las Vegas location of Dirty Dog [sic] thought they’d get 50 or 60 attendees at their Bluey day, presumably because they are fools who did not grasp the sheer terrifying power that the adorable Australian Blue Heeler holds over the minds of both children, and desperate parents grateful to be able to put something on their TVs that is actually funny and good for once. Despite getting thousands of RSVPs for the event on Facebook, the restaurant still didn’t prepare itself for the onslaught, leading to massive lines, shortages of giveaway materials, and lots of angry comments on their social media.

At least the kids got to see Bluey, though, right? A real costume and everything, and not some Spirit Halloween “Australian Blue Canine” bullshit that some poor employee got shoved into, pulling a Bluey-themed hood down over his face to try to hide his shame from God and everyone? Not so much, as reported by extremely funny child attendee Sophia, who declared (and really, you should just watch the clip, Sophia kicks ass) that she just couldn’t, with Bluey. “He looked like unexpected,” Sophia declared, funnier than we will ever be. “We could like see his beard.”

Dirty Dog [sic] has issued a formal apology to attendees to the event, writing that, “We are truly sorry this event wasn’t the expected experience… We hope to repair our relationship with you.”

[From AV Club]

After the Willy Wonka Experience debacle went viral, it is absolutely wild that anyone would try to half-ass an appearance involving a beloved family franchise, because just like Wonka, the Heeler family appeals to the whole fam. That said, the event was free, so it’s likely that Dirt Dog had good intentions of doing something for the community while also promoting themselves. So while Wonka may have been Fyre Fest for Families, I feel kinda bad calling this Fyre Fest for Toddlers. At least they didn’t attempt to add a poorly written AI script with an “evil chocolate maker who lives in the walls” character called the Unknown (that still cracks me up). So, there’s that.

If I had been in charge of Bluey Day and saw that it was getting thousands of RSVPs, I would have set some expectations and added language to the promo material saying something like, “First 50 fans get a Bluey cupcake!” and given out coupons for a free hot dog or something to make up for not having enough materials. I also would have found a female employee to play Bluey or invested in an actual costume instead of something a teenager wears to trick-or-treat, LMAO.

A Bluey event done by a Las Vegas restaurant has upset thousands of parents after the meet-&-greet was just a man in a Bluey onesie.

“Some kids were crying. Some kids were upset, crying in their parents’ shoulders”

(Source: https://t.co/AK9OpkH9SM) pic.twitter.com/xsWOL6aO1G

— DiscussingFilm (@DiscussingFilm) May 18, 2024

Categories
Controversies RuPaul

RuPaul’s Drag Race had a shock elimination last week (spoilers)



It is no understatement to say that last week’s elimination on RuPaul’s Drag Race had us gooped, gagged, and gobsmacked. And if you haven’t yet seen the March 1 episode (due to MTV/Paramount nonsense or other reasons), fair warning that spoilers lie ahead. The queens were tasked with fashioning goth get-ups out of provided materials, making it the third sewing challenge of the season. Mhi’ya Iman LePaige pulled together a passable look, only a lot of that pulling came from getting a fellow queen to do the sewing for her. Meanwhile Plasma did all her own sewing, but she attempted to do a look outside her comfort zone, and unfortunately the look was a miss. Both ladies landed in the bottom, making it Mhi’ya’s third lip sync with no challenge wins, and Plasma’s first lip sync with two challenge wins. So of course it was three strikes and you’re out for Mhi’ya… What? Shantay she stays?! But she done already had herses!!

A third design challenge in just nine episodes? After a spit-themed mini-challenge opened this week’s episode, the remaining eight queens on RuPaul’s Drag Race Season 16 were shocked to find it was time to breakout the sewing machines YET AGAIN. While seamstresses like Q, Nymphia Wind and Dawn rejoiced, the less fashion-gifted competitors immediately launched into panic mode, worried they’d follow last week’s victim, Xunami Muse, out the door.

The top eight spent most of the episode cobbling together outfits for the goth-inspired runway, which was presided over by model Kaia Gerber in addition to the usual judges. While some queens got high praise … others floundered, leading to the most shocking elimination we’ve seen on the show in several seasons.

Plasma’s elimination this week will go down in Drag Race herstory as one of the show’s most shocking. Not because it wasn’t deserved (the Broadway queen delivered what was easily the worst look of the night and was out lip-synced by Mhi’ya Iman Le’Paige), but because she’d already won two challenges. On Drag Race, frontrunners who have amassed two individual wins are typically awarded some kind of unspoken goodwill from Ru and are kept safe until the finale. Plasma, who had secured two individual challenge wins, however, found herself in a perfect storm and Ru seemed unwilling to throw her a bone. The only other queen to ever get booted this early with two wins was Max in Season 7 (and one of her wins was shared with Pearl). While obviously Plasma deserved to go home, I kept waiting for some shenanigans to save her, but her elimination was shockingly refreshing for a show that sometimes feels a bit formulaic. This also opens things up quite a bit for the remaining seven queens as we head into the end game.

It was not shocking that seasoned costumer Q would pick up her second design challenge win this week. While she certainly faced stiff competition from Dawn and Nymphia, Q’s massive victorian cloak earned rave reviews from the judges, and she secured her second victory. While this would typically solidify her for a spot in the finale, Plasma’s exit reinforces that two wins won’t necessarily save you.

[From Parade]

This article didn’t get into it, but the sewing issue really should’ve been a bigger deal. The judges called Mhi’ya out during the critiques, and while she admitted to getting some help from castmate Sapphira Cristal, she totally downplayed how much assistance Sapphira actually gave her, and everyone on that stage knew she was lying. Why Sapphira didn’t speak up to correct the record remains a mystery. I guess she’s just too much of a classy broad. So then we get to the lip sync… I’m reluctant to call Mhi’ya a “lip sync assassin,” because it’s not the lip syncing itself where she kills. It’s the flipping. She does a lot of gymnastic flips, and Ru seems to be enamored with them. The thing is, Mhi’ya hasn’t really made a mark anywhere else in the competition. She had a brief breakthrough during the Snatch Game, but overall the judges have been giving her the same note — that she seems withdrawn and as a result they don’t know who she is. Whereas with Plasma, you know exactly who she is, whether you like it or not. Plus she’s won two challenges. Plus she flippin’ sewed her own outfit and owned it! Oh I’m getting riled up all over again. And it’s not just me — the safe queens audibly gasped when Ru announced her verdict, like they were doing the spit-take mini challenge all over again.