Categories
Business food Starbucks

Pumpkin Spice Lattes were almost called Fall Harvest Lattes by Starbucks




The “-Ber” months are officially upon us. We can no longer escape the fact that, although there are still technically three weeks left of summer, fall and all of its many “isms” and products are now in play. This means that the world’s most well-known fall flavor, pumpkin spice, is about to fully launch.

While there are now many different pumpkin spice products out there, it actually could have gone a bit differently. The product that allegedly kicked it all off, Starbucks’ Pumpkin Spice Latte (PSL), almost wasn’t a thing. People just did an interview with Peter Dukes, who is known as the “father” of the PSL. They talked about how the PSL came about. According to Daddy PSL, pumpkin wasn’t a popular flavor the year that the drink was introduced, and Starbucks almost called PSLs “Fall Harvest Lattes.”

“We started to brainstorm different ideas that would resonate in the fall seasonal time period. We came up with hundreds of ideas,” he says, noting that there “were chocolate beverages and caramel beverages” also in the mix. “[We] quickly whittled down to 10 concepts that we wanted to bring forward to our customers with some paper concepts.”

They had an in-depth proposal — which featured a hand-drawn diagram of the beverage and an explanation of the drink’s flavor profile — for all 10 concepts they wanted to bring to market research. They asked the customers two main questions: How unique is this beverage and how likely are you to buy it? When they got back the results, the drinks featuring chocolate and caramel had scored the highest. In contrast, the pumpkin beverage scored the lowest in terms of customer interest, but nearly everyone agreed that it was unique. “This idea of pumpkin was rated as unique. What you need to keep in mind is that we’re going back to 2003,” Dukes explains. “The only thing pumpkin you would find in the marketplace was the pumpkin puree cans in the grocery store that people would use to make pumpkin pies.”

When the development team collaborated with the food scientists, they decided to move forward with four beverages: a chocolate-based one, a caramel beverage, and a cinnamon beverage. Despite mixed reviews, Dukes and the team felt strongly about the pumpkin beverage, and after a lengthy debate, it was approved as the fourth option. “One of the first things we did was we decorated the lab as if it were fall, even though it was springtime. We brought in leaves, pumpkins and anything else that would evoke a fall mindset,” Dukes recalls. “Then we brought in pumpkin pies. We took a bite of the pumpkin pie, mixed it with espresso in a sample cup and ate it.”

After the initial taste test, they spent a long time perfecting the recipe. Once they had the flavor down, they also had to come up with a name for the festive beverage that didn’t scare people away. Dukes admits that they were originally planning to call it the “Fall Harvest Latte,” but later landed on the PSL. “After discussions, we thought it was important that we were very clear and direct with our customers about what to expect when they taste it, because we knew that a potential hurdle was getting customers to try it,” he explains.

The spices played a crucial role: cinnamon, ginger, and cloves. Adding the spice in that descriptor of the name was an important part of the development for the Pumpkin Spice Latte,” he adds.

“Nobody knew it was gonna become what it has become for sure. We were excited to have a beverage that our customers really liked,” Dukes says. When it launched, the drink was popular, but it didn’t gain the widespread recognition it has today until it gained traction on social media. According to Starbucks, in 2014, the Pumpkin Spice Latte joined Twitter (now X) with a dedicated account called @TheRealPSL. During peak pumpkin season, more than 3,000 tweets per day include the #PSL hashtag.

[From People]

What’s in a name? “Fall Harvest” just doesn’t have the same feel or ring to it. It probably also helps that the PSL flavor is actually really good. I’m not a huge pumpkin-flavored fan, but I will occasionally f-ck with a PSL, both hot and iced. I like the taste in moderation, but they really do add a lot of sugar into that puppy. On that note, I love the pumpkin-spice smell, and will hit up T.J. Max or Kohl’s every fall in order to find a good candle to burn. While I’m okay with pumpkin spice as a candle scent, I do not like it in my cream cheese or yogurt. That said, I hope that whoever came up with the name “Pumpkin Spice Latte” has it on their LinkedIn, Facebook, Tinder/Grindr, etc. profile. That was literally a billion-dollar idea right there.

Categories
Business Marketing Names

MSNBC’s rebranding to MS NOW one of the ‘worst branding disasters in media history’




On Monday, the network soon-to-be formerly-known-as MSNBC announced its new name — My Source News Opinion World, or MS NOW — along with its new non-avian logo, and all of it pretty universally landed with a thud. I watched Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O’Donnell that night to see if either of them would address the rebrand, but they were too classy and stuck to the news. It’s a real achievement on the part of the marketing team, because MSNBC had an underdog/sympathetic edge going into this, due to the fact that NBC decreed to them (but not to CNBC) that they had to cease and desist using “NBC.” Even after they initially promised no one would have to change brand names! But no, instead it’s been a master class in how to underperform in retaliation, to the extent that I’m just imagining a Veep-style cast of characters making these decisions behind the scenes. There are some, however, rising to the occasion of this moment… in the form of excellent burns on the internet waxing on the main theme of this being “one of the worst branding disasters in media history.”

After the cable-news network announced it would become My Source News Opinion World, or MS NOW, later this year, netizens have taken to social media to make their disdain for the name and logo change more than abundantly clear.

The issue, according to the Internet, isn’t just the name, it’s also the look and “feel” of the new logo.

“MSNBC changing its name to MS NOW is one of the worst branding disasters in media history. The logo looks like it belongs on a discount computer from 1998, not a serious news network,” one user wrote. “Absurd.”

…The move conflicts with previous claims made by NBCUniversal that the network would be allowed to keep its name amid the shift. NBC’s iconic peacock logo will no longer be used for the cable-news network, either.

A memo sent Aug. 18 by MSNBC President Rebecca Kutler addressed the flip-flop, writing:

“During this time of transition, NBCUniversal decided that our brand requires a new, separate identity … The future of our success is not tied to remaining within the NBC family and using the peacock as part of our identity,” Rebecca Kutler, MSNBC President, wrote in an Aug. 18 memo addressed to staff.

The peacock-looking logo, according to MSNBC CEO Mark Lazarus, “is synonymous with NBCUniversal, and it is a symbol they have decided to keep within the NBCU family.”

Because of this decision, MSNBC is now free to “chart our own path forward, create distinct brand identities, and establish an independent news organization following the spin.”

MSNBC has certainly ruffled some feathers with the announcement, with netizens posting reactions (complete with GIFs), opinions and critiques about the rebrand, dubbed one of the “worst branding disasters in media history” on X, formerly known as Twitter, in the last 24 hours.

[From USA Today]

The rest of the USA Today article is a round-up of some of the best social media clapbacks, and they are all quite excellent. Like: “MSNBC to changing their name to MS NOW is like HBO changing their name to MAX and facebook changing to Meta and Twitter to X. I will never call it the new name,” followed by a GIF of Gandalf venting on Pippin Took: “Throw yourself in next time and rid us of your stupidity.” Or: “MS NOW sounds like a short-lived Windows operating system from the early 2000s that needlessly redesigned too much and failed to be adopted by a critical mass of users.” Plus: “*adjusting my tie and walking to her table to take my shot* Is there a MISTER NOW, MS NOW?” And: “After MS Now will be MS Go, and then MS Max, and then just MS.” There really is a wealth of creativity out there.

So in conclusion, the rebrand sucks on name, logo, and execution fronts. (Otherwise known as all fronts.) I said on Tuesday, and I know I’m not the only one, that the name reads like Multiple Sclerosis NOW. In regard to the logo, call me petty and/or vindictive, but I think they totally missed an opportunity to get back at NBC. How? By making their new logo another bird! Owls have symbolism related to knowledge, yes? Though coming out of November 2024, an ostrich may be more fitting.

After MS Now will be MS Go, and then MS Max, and then just MS.

— Scott Nover (@ScottNover) August 18, 2025

MS NOW sounds like a short-lived Windows operating system from the early 2000s that needlessly redesigned too much and failed to be adopted by a critical mass of users https://t.co/kSJO19bJxX

— Josh Billinson (@jbillinson) August 18, 2025

Photos via YouTube and Instagram

Categories
Business Marketing Names

MSNBC is changing its name to My Source News Opinion World, or MS NOW




Earlier this summer Warner Bros. Discovery announced it was splitting into two companies, one focused on streaming and new content, the other on TV networks they’re probably looking to sell. The division was modeled off the split Comcast revealed last November, in which they were keeping NBC Universal, NBC News, Peacock, and Bravo together, but moving other networks to a new company called Versant. The reassigned networks included USA, Oxygen, E!, SYFY, and the Golf Channel, as well as CNBC and MSNBC who were assured they would keep their 30-odd-year brand names. I mean, after we all went through the inane merry-go-round of HBO to HBO Max to Max then back to HBO Max, it’d just be bone stupid for another network to do the same— Wait, what’s this now? MSNBC is changing its name after all? Indeed, they are. But don’t worry, the new brand name rolls right off the tongue: My Source News Opinion World, aka MS NOW. SOS.

The name change was ordered by NBC Universal, which last November spun off cable networks USA, CNBC, MSNBC, E! Entertainment, Oxygen and the Golf Channel into its own company, called Versant. None of the other networks are changing their name.

MSNBC got its name upon its formation in 1996, as a partnership then between Microsoft and NBC. Even back then, it was a puzzling moniker to many. But it stuck, even after the NBC partnership with Microsoft that produced it ended, and Versant CEO Mark Lazarus said in the initial days of the spinoff that it would stay, making Monday’s announcement an unexpected about-face.

Name changes always carry an inherent risk, and MSNBC President Rebecca Kutler said that for employees, it is hard to imagine the network under a different name. “This was not a decision that was made quickly or without significant debate,” she said in a memo to staff.

“During this time of transition, NBC Universal decided that our brand requires a new, separate identity,” she said. “This decision now allows us to set our own course and assert our independence as we continue to build our own modern newsgathering organization.”

Kutler said the network’s editorial direction will remain the same. “While our name will be changing, who we are and what we do will not,” she said.

Still, it’s noteworthy that the business channel CNBC is leaving “NBC” in its name. MSNBC argues that CNBC has always maintained a greater separation and, with its business focus, is less likely to cover many of the same topics.

The affiliation between a news division that stresses objectivity and one that doesn’t hide its liberal bent has long caused tension. President Donald Trump refers to the cable network as “MSDNC,” for Democratic National Committee. Even before the corporate change, NBC News has been reducing the use of its personalities on MSNBC.

…MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough revealed the network’s new logo on his show Monday morning. “It looks very sporty,” he said.

[From AP via AOL]

“It looks very sporty.” Thanks, Joe, but pray tell, what sport is the new logo giving? Cause I’m not seeing it! I find the new look rather dull, more like a deliberately oblique presentation designed to mask the sinister organization underneath. Which is not what I think of MSNBC at all! And I guess they were really hell bent on keeping the ‘MS’ beginning the same (despite both original ties to Microsoft and NBC now being severed), but breaking it up to ‘MS’ – space – the next three letters? I just hope they’re ready for all the outreach they’re gonna get from people who think they’re contacting a Multiple Sclerosis research organization.

But I suppose I should stop ragging on the (uninspired) rebranding choices made, given that the article clearly states OG NBC mandated the change. Which is where this all gets political, much like the CBS/Paramount merger with Skydance that offered up Stephen Colbert and The Late Show to the altar of Trump’s overtanned yet under-nourished thin skin. Why was this directive to rebrand only issued to MSNBC, and not their business sister CNBC? And for that matter, why not keep all the NBCs together? Or maybe I’m just being cynical and everyone sincerely wanted to give MSNBC a “sporty” rebirth.

PS — As of this writing, there has been no known custody arrangement/ruling made regarding Steve Kornacki. I think it’s only fair for him to walk us through the odds of where he’ll go through a demonstration at the big board.

Embed from Getty Images

Categories
Business HBO Television

HBO Max’s password sharing crackdown will get ‘aggressive’




Netflix began cracking down on password sharing about two years ago. There were concerns about people who logged into their accounts while traveling or kids who used the family account while in college, but, of course those were only consumer-based worries. Disney and all of the other streaming services smelled profits in the water and quickly followed suit. Streaming consumers were about to enter into an extremely annoying, expensive timeline.

HBO Max is the latest service to get in on the action. Apparently, execs feel like they’re only in the first inning (their baseball metaphor, not mine!) in the war against password sharers. But, baseball is one of those slow-burn types of games. As the game heats up, HBO Max is preparing to get more “aggressive” about password sharing.

If you’ve been sharing account access to HBO Max, the good times are soon coming to an end. JB Perrette, head of streaming and gaming at Warner Bros. Discovery said on the company’s second-quarter earnings call that messaging to consumers is about to get more “aggressive.” The media company looking to close the loopholes by the end of 2025, with the impact starting to appear in its financials by 2026.

Following in Netflix’s lead, WBD, Disney and other media companies are all ramping up efforts to limit password sharing, anticipating a significant financial payoff from cracking down on once-overlooked practice.

Several months of testing has enabled WBD to determine “who’s a legitimate user who may not be a legitimate user,” Perrette said. Once that is determined, he continued, the next step is to “turn on the more aggressive language around what needs to happen” in order to and make sure that “we are putting the net in the right place, so to speak.”

Asked about what “inning” the process is in, to use the baseball cliché, Perrette said only the first. By the fourth quarter, he said, the process will be happening “in a much more aggressive fashion.”

“The message language right now has been a fairly soft, cancel-able message,” he said. It will “start to get more fixed and such that people have to take action as opposed to right now, sort of having to be a voluntary process.” Once those directives are established, he said, “the real benefit will start probably in the fourth quarter and then kick in in 2026.”

WBD reported solid results for the quarter, adding 3.4 million streaming subscribers (mostly via international expansion) to reach 125.7 million overall.

[From Deadline]

How long will it take us to get into the ninth inning? Perhaps HBO Max (HBO? Max?) should get its house in order before they start cracking down content sharing. They just canceled Duster, which was one of their only original program offerings. Since they don’t have a lot of new programming going on right now, many subscribers rely on their back catalog. That’s great and all, but what do they have that’s going to even drive (Duster pun intended) new viewers in? There are so many other options that all of these streamers are going to have to continually come up with new ways to draw people in. Otherwise, they’re going to lose a battle in which services like Roku offer older shows at a much cheaper price.

Photos credit: Avalon.red and via Instagram

Categories
Business Television

The Hulu app is going away this fall and is getting absorbed by Disney+




In 2019, Disney bought a controlling share of Hulu. Over the last six years, they’ve been steadily integrating Disney , Hulu, and ESPN subscriptions. This past June, Disney paid NBCUniversal almost $439 million to finally buy them out and gain full control of the streaming service. For the past two years, Disney has been really making a push to get users of all three services to use one login. As of right now, it’s not mandatory, but they make it increasingly more difficult for people like me who have two very separate Disney and Hulu accounts. (Disney is under Mr. Rosie’s email, Hulu uses mine.)

Now that they finally have full ownership, Disney is pushing ahead to completely absorb Hulu into the Disney brand. In an attempt to “unify” the brands, Disney has plans to “fully integrate” both services within the coming months. There’s going to be a single app that combines both services. People that subscribe to Hulu’s live TV will go over to Disney’s new joint venture, Fubo.

Say ciao to the stand-alone Hulu streaming app: Disney said it is “fully integrating” the Hulu service, which it now owns 100%, into its flagship Disney streamer.

A new “unified” Disney and Hulu streaming app will be available in 2026, the company said. According to a Disney rep, customers will still be able to buy a stand-alone Hulu subscription (as well as a stand-alone Disney plan).

“Today we are announcing a major step forward in strengthening our streaming offering by fully integrating Hulu into Disney ,” CEO Bob Iger and CFO Hugh Johnston said in prepared commentary on the media giant’s quarterly earnings. “This will create an impressive package of entertainment, pairing the highest-caliber brands and franchises, great general entertainment, family programming, news and industry-leading live sports content in a single app.”

The single Disney app with Hulu will deliver an “improved consumer experience,” which will lower churn, Iger said on the earnings call. Both services will be “on one tech platform,” which will result in cost synergies, according to Iger. In addition, Disney — which already sells ads for Disney and Hulu together — sees new opportunities for bundling ad sales by fully combining them, he said.

In their prepared remarks, the Disney execs said, “By creating a truly differentiated streaming offering, we will be providing subscribers tremendous choice, convenience, quality, and enhanced personalization. This will enhance our ability to continue to grow profitability and margins in our entertainment streaming business through expected higher engagement, lower churn, and advertising revenue potential, as well as operational efficiencies that over time may result in savings that we can reinvest back into the business.”

In addition, Hulu will become a global general entertainment brand: Starting in the fall of 2025, it will replace the Star tile on Disney internationally.

“Work is already underway to continue enhancing our technology, and over the coming months, we will be implementing numerous improvements within the Disney app, including exciting new features and a more personalized homepage,” Iger and Johnston said.

Meanwhile, Hulu’s live TV subscribers will be migrated over to Fubo, under a proposed joint venture majority-owned by Disney.

The move to fully sew Hulu together with Disney comes after Disney — following two years of negotiating — closed its deal with Comcast to buy out NBCUniversal‘s one-third stake in Hulu in June 2025. Disney paid Comcast in total about $9 billion, including $8.61 billion in November 2023 and $438.7 million this past June. Comcast had been seeking more than $13 billion for the 33% Hulu stake; the final price tag was determined through arbitration by a third-party banker.

Disney has already taken steps to integrate Hulu and Disney . In the spring of 2024, the Disney app launched “full” integration of Hulu content, which the company has used as a way to convert stand-alone Disney customers into bundled Disney /Hulu subs.

Also Wednesday, Disney announced that it will no longer report streaming subscriber numbers for Disney , Hulu and ESPN , following the lead of Netflix and others. In addition, the company set Aug. 21 as the launch date for its ESPN stand-alone streaming product, priced at $29.99/month.

[From Variety]

From a business POV, I get combining your popular platforms. That said, this whole thing just reeks of corporate America once again taking something from consumers and making it less affordable in the name of profits. Although they say that you can still buy stand-alone plans, we all know that this is most likely just a transitional approach to combining both – and eventually all three – brands together for an exorbitant amount of money. I say ‘eventually’ because the ESPN audience isn’t the same as the Disney /Hulu audience, and a bunch of different platforms offer ESPN right now.

I have different Disney and Hulu accounts. I basically take advantage of Black Friday deals every year. I’ve signed up for Hulu (and Peacock) using a different email every year and am riding it out on that $1.99/month until they stop offering the promos. Then, I’ll just completely cut both off. We really only use Disney and Paramount on the regular. I got a sweetheart deal for Disney through Amex that I honestly thought would expire two years ago, but it’s still going, so I’m afraid to lose it. Streaming TV had such economic promise for consumers when it first started. Sadly, we’re approaching a breaking point where they’re simply pricing people out. Something is going to give, and soon.

Categories
Affairs Business Concerts Gwyneth Paltrow

Astronomer hires Gwyneth Paltrow as their new temporary spokesperson




Astronomer surprised me! We ended last week with the confirmation that HR chief Kristin Cabot had officially resigned, days after CEO Andy Byron resigned, both coming after the coworkers were caught on the jumbotron at a Coldplay concert. (It’s like Mad Libs.) With the resignations, plus interim CEO Pete DeJoy waxing on how “surreal” the attention has been on their little billion-dollar tech company, I was all set for the story to die down for a bit. But then Astronomer stunned us by gooping it all up! The startup did a bit of clever PR over the weekend and dropped a video in which Gwyneth Paltrow — ex-wife of Coldplay frontman Chris Martin — announces herself as the “new temporary spokesperson” and talks up what it is that Astronomer does, all while cheekily referencing (but not discussing!) the whole cheating viral moment of it all. Well played, tech unicorns, well played.

Out of a sky full of stars, Astronomer wants Gwyneth Paltrow on its team.

One week after her ex Chris Martin joked about Andy Byron and Kristin Cabot—then the respective CEO and human resource head of Astronomer—”having an affair” when they hid from the camera at a July 15 Coldplay concert, the Oscar winner weighed in with a humorous take on the matter.

“I’ve been hired on a very temporary basis to speak on behalf of the 300-plus employees at Astronomer,” Paltrow quipped in a video released by the DataOps company July 25. “Astronomer has gotten a lot of questions over the last few days and they wanted me to answer the most common ones.”

But instead of breaking down the cheating speculation surrounding Byron and Cabot, the so-called “temporary spokesperson” started answering questions about data operations.

“We’ve been thrilled so many people have a newfound interest in data workflow automation,” Paltrow gushed, before plugging Astronomer’s DataOps conference as an answer for “other questions we’ve received” in the wake of the scandal.

She hilariously cut off Q&A submissions reading, “OMG what the actual f—” and “How is your social media team holding—” to expertly shift the focus back to the brand.

“We will now be returning to what we do best: Delivering game-changing results to our customers,” the Iron Man actress added. “Thank you for your interest in Astronomer.”

Needless to say, the internet quickly caught onto Astronomer’s cheekiness in having Paltrow star in its latest ad.

“Amazing crisis management,” one X user wrote, while another commented, “This is quite possibly the best recovery play I’ve seen a company pull off in a while. Way to lean into it lmao.”

A third X user praised, “This is PR masterclass. You take the most viral moment of July 2025 and, instead of disaster control, make light of the situation and create the ultimate brand awareness.”

[From E! News]

Again, for a company that’s presented itself as very shy and startled by the sudden spotlight, this was a very bold move for them! And I’m also impressed that they tapped Gwyneth, filmed a clip with her, and rolled out the video within 10 days of the inciting incident. This also conveniently lands just as Gwyneth: The Biography is coming out (Tuesday!), and author Amy Odell has already whipped up an Instagram post suggesting that Astronomer likely paid Gwyneth somewhere in the millions for this one-minute gig (based on her new inner knowledge of all things Goop). The video is fun, and I think Gwyneth would be a lot less divisive if she leaned more into this persona and backed away from pretending to be a doctor. Also, E! News didn’t quite capture the set up in their coverage; there are title cards with questions about the viral kiss cam moment, and then they cut to Gwyneth who talks up the company, as if that’s what was just asked. Like I said, it’s clever. The only angle not being squeezed for all it’s worth, here, is Gwyneth’s connection to Coldplay. And how she actually can relate to the cheat— aaaaand my transmission cut off.

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images


Embed

Top 8 most obnoxious things Gwyneth Paltrow has said!

Get the top 8 stories about Gwyneth Paltrow being a tone deaf a-hole when you sign up for our mailing list! – Katie at Celebitchy



.

Photos via YouTube, Backgrid and Astronomer

Categories
Affairs Business Coldplay Concerts

Astronomer HR head Kristin Cabot has also resigned after Coldplay cheating video




Chief People Office Kristin Cabot has finally resigned from tech company Astronomer (a unicorn!). The official exit comes days after CEO Andy Byron resigned, and a week after the pair of them, each married to other people, were caught on the kiss cam at a concert. They were watching Coldplay, where presumably they thought they’d be safe from attention or recognition of any kind. Instead, they went viral. Though the camera didn’t catch them actually kissing, their obvious knee-jerk reaction to hide ended up giving the game away.

Days after Astronomer CEO Andy Byron resigned from the tech startup, the HR exec who was with him at the infamous Coldplay concert has left as well.

“Kristin Cabot is no longer with Astronomer, she has resigned,” a company spokesperson wrote in an email to CNBC Thursday. Cabot was the company’s chief people officer.

Cabot and Byron, who is married with children, were shown in an intimate moment on the ‘kiss cam’ at a recent Coldplay show in Boston, and immediately hid when they saw their faces on the big screen. Lead singer Chris Martin said, “Either they’re having an affair or they’re just very shy.” An attendee’s video of the incident went viral.

Byron resigned from the company on Saturday. Both Cabot and Byron have been removed from the company’s leadership team webpage.

Pete DeJoy, Astronomer’s CEO, wrote in a post earlier this week that recent and unexpected national attention has turned the company into “a household name.”

In May, the New York-based company, which commercializes open source software, announced a $93 million investment round led by Bain Ventures and other investors, including Salesforce Ventures.

[From CNBC]

Before you start feeling too badly for Kristin getting booted out of a job (thanks to her own actions), I invite you to take a look at these pap shots from the Daily Mail of Kristin watering the garden of her stately, $2 million second home in New Hampshire that she bought this year with the man she’s still married to. I can’t believe it’s only been one week of Kiss Cam Gate™! Feels longer. Anyway, I think now is the time to leave these families to sort themselves out; that’s private and for them. The feeling of being swept up in a cultural moment, however, belongs to all of us. There’s for sure a movie to be made, here! It doesn’t even have to be about the couple. I’m thinking some Rashomon-style piece in which the kiss cam is the inciting incident around which we follow an ensemble of characters. So really the film is about all these other (fictional) people; snapshots of their lives, and then all vignettes are united through these disparate stories being intersected by one viral moment. Though I think this pic would easily be at home with A24, I am open to receiving offers from other studios as well. Except for Paramount.

photos credit: via Backgrid and Astronomer