Categories
donald trump Lawsuits Media politics

NPR sues Trump and the White House over funding ban




If you’re like me, you probably heard of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting before you were old enough to understand what it even was, because your favorite PBS show was bookended with “Funding for this program was made possible by The Corporation for Public Broadcasting and by annual financial support from Viewers Like You.” Formally established by Congress in 1967, the CPB is a nonprofit independent of the government. That’s by design. Congress is in charge of funding CPB (which it does two years in advance), and the President may appoint (but not remove) board members; but no part of the federal government has jurisdiction over how CPB metes out its, on average, $500 million a year to local public broadcasters. So naturally, last month Trump tried firing three of CPB’s five board members, CPB sued in return, and days later Trump sharpied one of his executive orders barring CPB from distributing Congressionally appropriated funds to NPR and PBS. Now NPR is joining the fray, and are suing (along with three Colorado radio stations) Trump and the White House over the illegal funding ban:

“It is not always obvious when the government has acted with a retaliatory purpose in violation of the First Amendment. ‘But this wolf comes as a wolf,’” the legal filing for the public broadcasters states. “The Order targets NPR and PBS expressly because, in the President’s view, their news and other content is not ‘fair, accurate, or unbiased.’”

The line about the “wolf” was drawn from a 1988 dissent by the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

The lawsuit says the administration is usurping Congress’ power to direct how federal money will be spent and to pass laws. It names President Trump, White House budget director Russell Vought, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Maria Rosario Jackson, the chair of the National Endowment for the Arts, as defendants. … “The Executive Order is a clear violation of the Constitution and the First Amendment’s protections for freedom of speech and association, and freedom of the press,” NPR President and CEO Katherine Maher said in a statement.

…Trump cited his authority as president under the Constitution and federal laws in making the order and said that neither NPR nor PBS “presents a fair, accurate, or unbiased portrayal of current events to taxpaying citizens.” In other public statements, Trump and his allies have called the public broadcasters “left-wing propaganda” and made similarly disparaging remarks. An accompanying fact sheet put out by the White House cited the claim that NPR published articles “insist[ing] that COVID-19 did not originate in a lab” and “refused to cover the Hunter Biden laptop story.”

“The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) is creating media to support a political party on the taxpayers’ dime. Therefore, the President is exercising his lawful authority to limit funding to NPR and PBS,” said Harrison Fields, a White House spokesperson, in a statement on Tuesday. “The President was elected with a mandate to ensure efficient use of taxpayer dollars, and he will continue to use his lawful authority to achieve that objective.”

NPR’s Maher rejected such ideological characterizations, pointing to such statements by Trump to argue he was seeking to exact illegal retribution for their news coverage.

“This is retaliatory, viewpoint-based discrimination in violation of the First Amendment. The Supreme Court has ruled numerous times over the past 80 years that the government does not have the right to determine what counts as ‘biased,’” Maher said in her statement Tuesday. “NPR will never agree to this infringement of our constitutional rights, or the constitutional rights of our Member stations, and NPR will not compromise our commitment to an independent free press and journalistic integrity.”

[From NPR]

Trump, the boy who cried “But Hunter Biden’s laptop!” Not to suggest that journalists shouldn’t shine a light on possible corruption, which is why Trump should be pleased by the plentiful reporting NPR has been running on a very recent, blatant case of ethics violations coming out of DC. Merde. I can’t say this development of NPR suing over Trump’s retaliatory actions is surprising, coming on the heels of Trump attacking/decimating the NEA, NEH, Smithsonian, and all who refuse to kowtow to a clown. But it’s still all so surreal and more than a tad soul-crushing. Big applause goes to institutions like AP News, Harvard University, and now NPR, that are fighting back with lawsuits. The law is on our side! And for what it’s worth, the Congressionally appointed funds Trump wants to block CPB from distributing account for 15% of PBS’s total funds, 10% for NPR stations, and 1% for NPR itself directly. Not nothing, but not everything, either. So while CPB is working to retain its right to make funding possible for our public stations, now’s the time for Viewers Like Us to step in and contribute, where we can.

Embed from Getty Images

Photos via YouTube/Ted, Instagram and credit Getty

Categories
AI Books Media

Chicago Sun-Times apologizes for AI-generated summer reading list




Though I didn’t fully appreciate it at the time, one of the best day jobs I ever had was as a receptionist. Not because I have a great love of patching phone calls through, but because I basically got to sit up front by myself and read all day. What a luxury! Then I was an idiot and accepted a promotion, sigh… When it came to the very personal question of selecting which books to read, obviously I followed word of mouth from friends and family, plus building a network of favorite authors and seeking out their work. I also picked up from my mother checking out recommendations from Vanity Fair, People Mag, and perusing the recent releases section of the library. So my head and heart go out to the readers of major newspapers last weekend who sought out a summer reading list. Why? Because the list turned out to be an AI-generated collection of books that, to quote the Chicago Sun-Times’s apology, “do not exist.” Read the human-penned apology for yourself:

On Sunday, May 18, the print and e-paper editions of the Chicago Sun-Times included a special section titled the Heat Index: Your Guide to the Best of Summer, featuring a summer reading list, that our circulation department licensed from King Features, a unit of Hearst, one of our national content partners. The special section was syndicated to the Chicago Sun-Times and other newspapers.

To our great disappointment, that list was created through the use of an AI tool and recommended books that do not exist. We are actively investigating the accuracy of other content in the special section. We will provide more information on that investigation when we have more details.

The Chicago Sun-Times has committed its strong journalism resources to local coverage in the Chicago region. Our journalists are deeply focused on telling the stories of this city and helping connect Chicagoans with one another. We also recognize that many of our print readers turn to us for national and broader coverage beyond our primary focus on the Chicago region. We’ve historically relied on content partners, such as King Features, for syndicated materials to help supplement our work, including national articles as well as comics and puzzle books.

King Features worked with a freelancer who used an AI agent to help build out this special section. It was inserted into our paper without review from our editorial team, and we presented the section without any acknowledgement that it was from a third-party organization.

King Features released a statement to Chicago Public Media saying it has “a strict policy with our staff, cartoonists, columnists, and freelance writers against the use of AI to create content. The Heat Index summer supplement was created by a freelance content creator who used AI in its story development without disclosing the use of AI. We are terminating our relationship with this individual. We regret this incident and are working with the handful of publishing partners who acquired this supplement.”

We are in a moment of great transformation in journalism and technology, and at the same time our industry continues to be besieged by business challenges. This should be a learning moment for all journalism organizations: Our work is valued — and valuable — because of the humanity behind it.

At Chicago Public Media, we are proud of our credible, independent journalism, created for and by people. And part of the journalistic process is a commitment to acknowledging mistakes. It is unacceptable that this content was inaccurate, and it is equally unacceptable that we did not make it clear to readers that the section was produced outside the Sun-Times newsroom. Our audiences expect content with our name on it to meet our editorial standards.

[From Chicago Sun-Times]

Chicago Sun-Times: “It wasn’t us, it was our third-party partner King Features! We maintain the highest journalistic integrity!” King Features: “It wasn’t us, it was a lone rogue nameless freelancer! We demand the highest integrity from our freelancers! But, yeah, oops.” Am I the only one getting a kick out of the gravely serious tone of this notice? Yes, they totally f–ked up, but the language here is so self-flagellating… all for an explanation that’s still basically passing off the buck to someone else, not once but twice. Something about the high stakes with which they’re treating the snafu is tickling my funny bone. This totally feels like it could be an episode of the forthcoming midwestern newspaper-set Office reboot, The Paper!

As for the AI of it all, between the technology ascribing fake movie reviews to real critics in the Megalopolis trailer, to its making an X-rated boo-boo by slapping the Wicked Barbie doll boxes with a link to an adult website, at what point can we drop the “intelligence” part, and just call it “artificial”?

Photos credit: Anna Tarazevich/Pexels, Lory Lory/Pexels, Mike Jones/Pexels

Categories
Jeff Bezos Media

Jeff Bezos forced out WaPo’s Opinions Editor by demanding a sole libertarian view

Just before the 2024 election, Jeff Bezos and Will Lewis (the Murdoch-henchman and Washington Post CEO) ordered the Washington Post’s staff to kill the paper’s planned endorsement of Kamala Harris. This unfolded in the final two weeks of the election, with Bezos claiming that the kill order came from him because he wants WaPo (which he owns) to operate with less of a political agenda. Nevermind Bezos’ very public delight when Donald Trump won the election – Bezos quickly congratulated Trump on social media and donated $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund. It seems that it’s quite alright for a newspaper and newspaper owner to have a political agenda, as long as that agenda is fascist, authoritarian, oligarchical and unhinged. Speaking of, Bezos continues to meddle in the daily operations of WaPo, and this week, he forced out WaPo’s Opinions Editor:

The Washington Post’s billionaire owner, Jeff Bezos, announced a sweeping new libertarian vision for the paper’s opinion sections on Wednesday, just four months after his decision to kill a presidential endorsement of Kamala Harris triggered hundreds of thousands of subscribers to cancel. Post Opinions Editor David Shipley, whom Bezos recruited from Bloomberg Opinions in 2022, chose to resign rather than stay to oversee the paper’s revamped sections.

“We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets,” Bezos wrote in a memo to staffers announcing the changes. “We’ll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.”

Newspaper op-ed sections have incorporated opposing views for years. The term “op-ed” is literally an abbreviation for pieces running “opposite the editorial pages” that often conflicted with a publisher’s editorial line. But Bezos characterized that practice as outdated.

“There was a time when a newspaper, especially one that was a local monopoly, might have seen it as a service to bring to the reader’s doorstep every morning a broad-based opinion section that sought to cover all views,” Bezos said. “Today, the internet does that job.”

At an hour-long meeting with opinion writers, Shipley said he did not know what lay ahead, according to an attendee who spoke on condition of anonymity because they did not have permission to speak publicly. Shipley said he had wanted a “broader, pluralistic place,” but that Bezos sought “a focused [opinion] report.”

Bezos justified his decision in the memo to staffers. “I am of America and for America, and proud to be so,” he wrote. “And a big part of America’s success has been freedom in the economic realm and everywhere else.”

The decision sparked fresh shock and dismay at the paper. After senior news editors raised concerns at a meeting Wednesday, Executive Editor Matt Murray reassured them that Bezos had given no indication that he wanted to interfere with news coverage, according to two people with direct knowledge. A spokesperson for the Post confirmed his remarks.

[From NPR]

“We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets.” And that’s why Bezos killed the Post’s endorsement of the candidate who would defend personal liberties and free markets? That’s why Bezos is sycophantically courting Donald Trump, who is interfering in free markets and personal liberties? WaPo is so f–ked, my god. Bezos has absolutely lost the plot.

Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos just emailed the paper’s staff to announce a “change coming to our opinion pages.”

[image or embed]

— Will Oremus (@willoremus.com) February 26, 2025 at 9:43 AM

Photos courtesy of Cover Images, Avalon Red.

Categories
donald trump Karoline Leavitt Media

The Trump White House will select which media outlets will be part of the press pool

Over the past year, many sensible, intelligent people simply began to tune out the news. There was a bump with the 2024 election, but newspapers, cable news and network news were completely unprepared for the steep drop-off in readership and viewership post-election. That’s why cable news networks have been dropping their on-air talent like flies, and that’s why there have been layoffs at most American newspapers. They all thought it was going to be like 2016/17 all over again, where people believed that they were fighting in the Resistance by supporting the media. In the years since, people watched as too many in the media normalized Donald Trump and completely failed to keep the public informed and educated about what was really happening across the board. The media cast their votes for chaos, then enabled everything that’s happening now, and from where I sit, few American journalists are respected or sympathetic in the MAGA Era. Well, now the Trump administration is changing the rules about which outlets are allowed in the media “pools,” the limited sprays allowed in the Oval Office or in more close quarters. The AP is suing over part of this too.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that the White House would now determine which outlets will be members of the press pool, the smaller group of journalists who are allowed into events in the Oval Office or travel with the president on Air Force One.

For decades, the White House Correspondents’ Association has handled the logistics of the press pool, including determining which outlets will be assigned for duty and when they will participate. The set up designed to prevent an administration from retaliating against journalists whose coverage they disfavor. At the briefing, Leavitt said that the change would open up the pool to a greater number of news outlets.

“Legacy outlets who have participated in the press pool for decades will still be allowed to join, but we will also be offering the privilege to well-deserving outlets who have never been allowed to share in this awesome responsibility,” she said.She said that they will continue the rotation among the five major television networks “to ensure the president’s remarks are heard far and wide around this world.” Speaking to reporters later today, Trump said, “We’re going to be calling those shots.”

But Eugene Daniels, the president of the WHCA, said that the move “tears at the independence of a free press in the United States. It suggests the government will choose the journalists who cover the president. In a free country, leaders must not be able to choose their own press corps.”

Other members of the press corps also criticized the move. Jacqui Heinrich, senior White House correspondent for Fox News, challenged Leavitt’s claim that the change gives “power back to the people. This move does not give the power back to the people – it gives power to the White House,” Heinrich wrote on X. “The WHCA is democratically elected by the full-time White House press corps. WHCA has determined pools for decades because only representatives FROM our outlets can determine resources all those outlets have – such as staffing – in order to get the President’s message out to the largest possible audience, no matter the day or hour.”

[From Deadline]

I was done with the White House Press corps when they pulled all of those shenanigans with President Biden last summer. There were WH press corps posting selfies from Biden’s press conferences and joking about taking bets as to when he would announce his retirement. Few of these people get any sympathy from me. I get why this is bad and of course I think it’s completely ludicrous that the White House is going to hand-pick their favored wingnut press outlets to embiggen Dear Leader. Too many of these journalists and media outlets thought they would get a ratings bonanza if he was reelected, so they did everything to enable that outcome. Elect a clown, expect a circus. This is the result of years of asinine political theater, enabled by those same journalists, and we’re again paying the price.

In case you think I’m being too harsh on the WH press corps, this was their reaction following the first week of the second Trump administration. They were so bored of President Biden’s competence and lack of drama.

“We’re so back” one reporter whispered to another

“Biden was boring!”

Oh well. Enjoy ????????‍♂️ https://t.co/MAS3IimW0I pic.twitter.com/CccQ2UNeEp

— T. Fisher King (@T_FisherKing) February 25, 2025

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

Categories
Joy Reid Lester Holt Media

Lester Holt is out as NBC Nightly News anchor & Joy Reid is out at MSNBC

In recent days, there’s been a lot of media gossip in and around MSNBC and NBC News. One big story is that Lester Holt is stepping down as the anchor of NBC Nightly News. This was announced on Monday, with Holt writing a letter to NBC News’ staffers:

Lester Holt, the veteran NBC newscaster and anchor of the “NBC Nightly News” over the last decade, announced on Monday that he will step down from the flagship evening newscast in the coming months. Mr. Holt told colleagues that he would remain at NBC, expanding his duties at “Dateline,” where he serves as the show’s anchor.

“It has truly been the honor of a lifetime to work with each of you every day, keeping journalism as our true north and our viewers at the center of everything we do,” Mr. Holt, 65, wrote in a memo to colleagues.

He said that he would continue anchoring the evening news until “the start of summer.” The network did not immediately name a successor.

Mr. Holt provided a steady hand to “NBC Nightly News” when he ascended to the job in 2015. The evening newscast was mired in a scandal after it was revealed that Brian Williams, the anchor at the time, had embellished a story about a helicopter attack in Iraq.

[From The NY Times]

While there was some criticism of Holt last year for the ways in which he conducted various interviews in and around the presidential election, Holt was absolutely seen as a steady hand and an old-fashioned news anchor. I also don’t think those controversies are why he’s stepping down? Page Six claims that Holt’s successor will be Tom Llamas or Hallie Jackson, but Llamas will probably get it.

Holt was also NBC’s first Black anchor of their nightly news. Which brings me to the shenanigans at MSNBC – apparently, a few of the anchors of color got sh-tcanned in recent days. To be fair, everyone knew the ax would fall on some of these people, especially now that the bottom dropped out for every cable news network except Fox News. Millions of voters did not appreciate MSNBC’s election coverage and those people (myself included) have simply stopped watching cable news entirely. MSNBC has seen absolutely decrepit viewership numbers post-election and everyone knew that people would be fired and replaced and that major shakeups were coming. I’m not sure people predicted that MSNBC would replace or fire all of the non-white anchors though.

MSNBC announced a series of programming changes Monday that amount to a major shake-up to the network’s daytime, evening and weekend lineups. Most significantly, the network is canceling the 7 p.m. show hosted by Joy Reid, the progressive commentator who in 2020 became the only Black woman to host a daily prime-time cable news program.

In her place, the network will air a show hosted by Symone Sanders Townsend, the former chief spokesperson to then-Vice President Kamala Harris; Michael Steele, the former Republican National Committee chairman; and veteran journalist Alicia Menendez. The trio currently host a show titled “The Weekend.”

The network has also decided to end Alex Wagner’s tenure as part-time host of the 9 p.m. hour. Since 2022, Rachel Maddow has hosted the 9 p.m. hour on Monday nights and Wagner hosted the rest of the week. As part of the network’s coverage of the first 100 days of the new Trump administration, Maddow has been hosting her show five nights per week, moving Wagner to a role as a roving correspondent covering the early impacts of Donald Trump’s presidency.

When Maddow’s every-evening stint ends at the end of April, former White House press secretary Jen Psaki will instead host the 9 p.m. hour Tuesday through Friday going forward, the network announced, with Wagner remaining with the network as a senior political analyst. Psaki, who is seen as a rising star at the network, currently hosts “Inside with Jen Psaki,” which airs on Sunday afternoons and Monday evenings.

A source with knowledge of the situation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment, said that Reid’s departure should not be read as a move to the political center, considering that Reid has long been an outspoken critic of the president.

[From WaPo]

So Joy Reid is the only one being fired outright, while other anchors are being shifted around. Are they also saying Alex Wagner will be completely gone or are they giving her something else to do? Jonathan Capehart will still have a weekend show and so will Ayman Mohyeldin. Anyway… yeah… I watched MSNBC last year during the election and let’s just say, I’m not mad that Joy is being pushed out. MSNBC has needed a big shakeup for a while, but honestly, it’s too late at this point (for me, at least). It’s also wild that Mika & Joe are apparently going nowhere??

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

Categories
Business Media

‘Hot Ones’ studio ‘First We Feast’ sold by Buzzfeed for $82.5 million




In an era in which society has moved away from legacy broadcast media and onto streaming platforms, there have been some great, independent, interview-style shows popping up via YouTube. One of the absolute best shows to come from YouTube is Hot Ones, which is produced by the studio First We Feast and now has more than 14 million subscribers and many more million views per episode. I’m sure you’ve all watched at least one episode. It’s a fantastic show with well-researched questions. Sean Evans is an amazing host.

Buzzfeed bought First We Feast back in 2021 as a part of a larger media acquisition of a company called Complex Networks. In February 2024, the company sold Complex Networks off but kept First We Feast. Well, Buzzfeed needed to reduce more of its debt, so it just sold First We Feast to a group of investors, including Evans, Chris Schonberger (FWF’s founder), Crooked Media (Pod Save America), Rhett & Link’s Mythical Entertainment (Good Mythical Morning), and George Soros’ Soros Fund Management. The deal was for $82.5 million. Schonberger will serve as CEO while Evans will become the company’s first chief creative officer.

BuzzFeed announced a deal to sell First We Feast, the studio behind the popular YouTube chicken-wing-eating celebrity talk show “Hot Ones,” for $82.5 million in cash to a group of investors. The consortium of buyers includes First We Feast founder Chris Schonberger and “Hot Ones” host Sean Evans, alongside podcast media company Crooked Media, Rhett & Link’s Mythical Entertainment and Soros Fund Management, the investment firm founded by billionaire financier George Soros. First We Feast said additional investors will be announced at a later date.

“Hot Ones,” first launched in 2015, now has more than 14 million subscribers on YouTube and 4 billion views to date on the platforms. Hosted by Evans and “known for its deeply researched questions,” the show has featured dozens of high-profile guests including Gordon Ramsay, Jennifer Lawrence, Shaquille O’Neal, Tom Holland, Jimmy Fallon, Kevin Hart, Post Malone, Millie Bobby Brown, Paul Rudd, Margot Robbie, David Beckham, Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman.

Earlier this year, First We Feast was engaged in talks with Netflix to produce live “Hot Ones” shows for the streamer.

With BuzzFeed’s sale, First We Feast will become an independent company led by Schonberger, who will assume the role of CEO, and Evans, who is taking on the newly created position of chief creative officer in addition to his ongoing tenure as host of “Hot Ones.” Sarah Honda, SVP of operations and brand strategy, will continue to oversee operations and serve as a co-executive producer of “Hot Ones” and SVP of client partnerships Brendan Kelly will continue to head up brand partnerships and ads sales for the business.

Today’s announcement marks an exciting new chapter in First We Feast’s history,” Schonberger said in a statement. “Being part of this incredible journey has been one of the greatest joys of my life. Our proven expertise in developing compelling formats, iconic IP, and best-in-class interviews makes us uniquely positioned to build on the brand’s momentum and supercharge our growth.”

The new investment in First We Feast will let it expand into new areas, Schonberger said, including new platforms, live events and talent acquisitions.

Evans, who noted that he hosted the very first episode of “Hot Ones” in March 2015, said, “As we approach the 10th anniversary of ‘Hot Ones’ next season, I’m constantly amazed by the passion and loyalty of our fans, who have made this journey so special. Not only is ‘Hot Ones’ a hit show, but it’s an experience — a cultural touchpoint that audiences want to be a part of, whether they’re watching, tasting the sauces, or sharing in the challenge with friends.”

He added: “The future is spicy, and I can’t wait to see what’s next.”

[From Variety]

That group of investors is interesting. Soros and Rhett & Link’s financial involvement didn’t surprise me at all. Crooked Media did a little bit, though, because Pod Save America’s interview with VP Kamala Harris’ campaign team a few weeks ago broke the “news” about why we never got that Harris/Walz Hot Ones appearance, which is that the show didn’t want to get political. I’d love to know what went on behind-the-scenes there because this deal had to have been in the works when it was recorded. (FWIW, I don’t think their involvement is anything other than another financial investment, so I don’t think we’re going to be seeing any sudden hard political turn from FWF.)

Anyway, good for Evans and Schonberger! They’re living the dream right now. The first content that will be produced post-sale is the Hot Ones annual holiday special on December 19. I hope First We Feast is super successful as its own independent entity. And while I don’t think they’re going to suddenly get political, I do wonder what new and creative shows they’ll produce now and whether or not any of the current shows will change now that they don’t answer to a parent company. It sounds like they’ve got some big plans to expand the brand and I’m looking forward to seeing what comes next.

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Photos credit: Ferrari – Look/Look Press/Avalon/Avalon, Robin Platzer/Twin Images/Avalon, Getty and screenshot from YouTube/First We Feast

Categories
Alex Jones Lawsuits Media

The Onion is still committed to buying Infowars after their recent setback in court




Last month, it was reported that satirical news website The Onion had won a bidding war to buy Alex Jones’ evil right-wing media company, including his Infowars website. They’d even worked together with the families of the Sandy Hook victims to ensure that they had enough money. The results were promptly challenged by First United American Companies (FUAC), an LLC associated with Jones’ other business dealings. FUAC claimed that they had made a bid that was “twice as much cash” as The Onion’s bid.

Both parties appeared in court this week for a two-day hearing in which they presented their cases. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez, who was appointed to serve the Southern District of Texas in 2019, ruled that the process was “unfair” because FUAC wasn’t given the final chance to outbid The Onion. As a result, he would not approve the sale and instead, sent it back down to the trustee to decide what to do next.

A bankruptcy judge on Tuesday rejected a bid by The Onion’s parent company to buy Alex Jones’ far-right media empire, including the website Infowars, ruling that the auction process was unfair.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez said after a two-day hearing that The Onion’s parent company, Global Tetrahedron, had not submitted the best bid and was wrongly named the winner of an auction last month by a court-appointed trustee.

“I don’t think it’s enough money,” Lopez said in a late-night ruling from the bench in a Houston court. “I’m going to not approve the sale.”

It was not immediately clear whether there would be a new auction in which The Onion could bid again for Jones’ assets. Lopez said he would leave the decision about what to do next in the hands of the trustee, Christopher Murray, who had overseen the auction.

The judge said Murray had acted in good faith in running the auction in which The Onion’s parent company initially appeared to prevail, but he said the trustee did not run a transparent process and should have given a rival bidder associated with Jones another chance to improve its bid.

“I think you’ve got to go out and try to get every dollar,” Lopez said. “I think that the process fell down.”

The ruling dashed, at least for now, Global Tetrahedron’s plans to take over Infowars and radically shift its content from anti-government conspiracy theories to satirical humor. Instead, Jones can continue operating his far-right media business as he has for decades.

Jones went live from a studio soon after the ruling and told viewers: “We can celebrate the judge doing the right thing.” He had previously referred to the sale process as “auction fraud” and a “fraudulent sale.”

Onion CEO Ben Collins said in a statement on X that the company was “deeply disappointed” but would “continue to seek a path towards purchasing InfoWars in the coming weeks.”

“It is part of our larger mission to make a better, funnier internet, regardless of the outcome of this case,” he said.

“We appreciate that the court repeatedly recognized The Onion acted in good faith, but are disappointed that everyone was sent back to the drawing board with no winner, and no clear path forward for any bidder,” Collins continued. Collins previously covered disinformation and conspiracy theories for NBC News, a beat that often meant covering Jones.

The Onion’s parent company had partnered in its bid with families of the victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting who successfully sued Jones for defamation, winning court judgments now valued at $1.2 billion. Part of the company’s plan for Infowars was to make anti-violence organization Everytown for Gun Safety the exclusive advertiser.

Chris Mattei, an attorney for the Connecticut families, said they were also disappointed.

“These families, who have already persevered through countless delays and roadblocks, remain resilient and determined as ever to hold Alex Jones and his corrupt businesses accountable for the harm he has caused,” he said in a statement.

“This decision doesn’t change the fact that, soon, Alex Jones will begin to pay his debt to these families and he will continue doing so for as long as it takes,” Mattei said.

Last month’s announcement that Global Tetrahedron had been named the winner of the auction shocked the media world and fans of both Jones and The Onion, but that announcement was only a recommendation from the trustee and required approval from Lopez, who is overseeing Jones’ bankruptcy case.

[From NBC News]

Well, this sucks for so many reasons. It sucks because we can’t have nice things. It sucks because the company that challenged The Onion is affiliated with Jones and they clearly have unlimited dark money. But most of all, it sucks because Jones is gloating to have gotten the ruling that he wanted. This feels like The Empire Strikes Back and it’s so frustrating! I don’t know what kind of funds The Onion and its parent company have to compete with whatever Jones’ business partners have, but I truly hope that they can pull it off. Is it legal for them to crowdfund it? I would totally contribute some money to that cause.

A statement from The Onion about InfoWars.

[image or embed]

— Tim Onion (@bencollins.bsky.social) December 11, 2024 at 12:14 AM

Embed from Getty Images

Photos are via YouTube/Law & Crime Channel