Categories
instagram Movies Wes Anderson

Wes Anderson isn’t on Instagram: ‘I don’t have any password’




I realized recently that I’ve been referring to The Phoenician Scheme as, “Wes Anderson’s latest confection.” I think the inclination comes from his movies always being pretty as a pastry! There’s certainly no denying the look of a Wes Anderson confection film: the colors are saturated, the scenes are stylized, and regardless of whenever the story is set, there’s a retro feel to the worlds he conjures. Over the course of Anderson’s career, so much of our lives have moved online. For some fans, this has given them the opportunity to celebrate, as The Guardian called him, “the world’s chief auteur of cinematic whimsy.” There’s the Wes Anderson Palettes Tumblr that highlights central colors from movie stills. Or the Accidentally Wes Anderson Instagram handle that features snaps of real-life locales that could be easily confused for Anderson compositions. Yet not at all surprisingly, Anderson himself has resisted the gravitational pull towards the internet and social media. But he has been made aware of these online tributes, and commented on them in a new interview with Kristy Puchko at Mashable:

While interviewing Anderson about The Phoenician Scheme, I asked what he makes of the online fervor around his films’ looks. I specifically mentioned Accidentally Wes Anderson, as Focus Features teamed up with the Instagram account for a pair of advance screenings of The Phoenician Scheme.

Of that account, Anderson said, “Well, the Accidentally people, they tend to [post] landscapes and objects and things. And they’re all these kind of great pictures. I see them, and I get it. I understand the connection, and I’m interested. I’d like to visit this place or that place. They’re just good.”

However, he’s less fond of other attempts at capturing his style. “If it’s somebody who’s imitating me [and my work], but making the people just stoic, dead expression,” he said, “I don’t feel that’s what I do. I wouldn’t print [that] take, right?”

Anderson went onto explain he’s not very online, saying, “I’m on, like, Wikipedia, and I do a ton of emails. I mean, we do so much work by emails, but I don’t have any social media. And if somebody tells me, look at this thing [on social media] — I can’t even. It doesn’t even tell me how to get into that. I don’t have any password.” His awareness of the online memes and accounts about his work is something he is mostly aware of because of friends sending him screenshots.

Still, he mused about such fan reactions, “But then I think, ‘Well, what is it that I’m doing that makes you think that’s what I like?’ But I get, I understand. There are things that maybe if you reduce them a little bit? But whatever it is, mostly it’s nice to have people be interested.

“If somebody’s inspired to make something because of something I made, I like that. Because I’ve been inspired to make things by things other people have made. That’s my main reaction, and beyond that, my main reaction is, I never look at any of this stuff.”

[From Mashable]

First of all, Wes Anderson uses email?! Not a typewriter to print out messages that then get dispatched via a messenger pigeon whose left wing is recently injured from an accident related to a reunion with a newly discovered long lost relative so he (the pigeon) travels by miniature bicycle instead during his prolonged convalescence? I’m shocked, shocked I tell you! All jesting aside, Wes got lucky with his date of birth, establishing himself before social media blew up, so he could afford not to get involved with it all. The line that killed me, though, was “I have no password.” Password. Singular. Like the rest of us aren’t storing eleventy billion passwords on our phones. But what about something like accessing medical records? Doesn’t he need a password for that?

As for the tributes, I feel for Wes, here. On the one hand, he doesn’t want to insult people identifying as big fans, nor stifle their budding forms of expression. On the flipside, I can totally understand him bristling against all his work being reduced to just a visual style. He’s had to rebuff that notion before, saying “even if the form is essential, a film is first and foremost a script, a cast.” Similarly, I think it’s a real misrepresentation to say his characters are stoic. If anything, I think his characters usually reflect people who are bursting with emotion but inept at dealing with it. And of course the kicker is at the end, when after responding in detail he says, “I never look at any of this stuff.” Sure, Jan! And here’s something else I can’t believe: not one of these tribute sites has coined the name The Film Aesthetic with Wes Anderson.

Photos credit: Marion Curtis/StarPix for Focus Features/INSTARimages, Julie Edwards/Avalon, Olivier Huitel/Avalon

Categories
AI instagram Madonna photos Pope Francis

Madonna posted AI photos of herself with the Pope and people are mad




Life is a mystery. Everyone must stand alone. Unless you use AI to generate photos of yourself standing next to the Pope. Standing very close next to the Pope. Which is what Madonna did on Friday night, posting two images to her Instagram where she and Pope Francis are embracing, with the odd captions, “Going into the weekend like…” for one, and “Feels good go be seen…” for the other. But just like a dream, these pics are not what they seem. In both “photos,” Miss Madge is scantily-clad in lacey black while Francis complements her in papal white. While Madame X dressing provocatively isn’t anything new, her unsuspectingly dragging the head of the Catholic Church into a couple of intimate-looking poses has plenty of people upset. Let the choir sing:

The first photo depicted the pope, 87, hugging the “Frozen” singer, 66, from the side with a huge smile across his face. His nose was pressed against her cheek.

“Going into the weekend like…” she captioned the head-turning snap.

The second image showed Madonna in a lacy corset with Pope Francis seemingly going in for a kiss as he wrapped one arm around her waist.

“Feels Good to Be Seen……” the “Like a Virgin” singer penned atop the second snap.

Social media users were quick to slam Madonna over the images, with one calling her actions “ridiculously disrespectful.”

Another person wrote via X that the “Vogue” singer’s post was “creepy,” while a third unamused individual said, “This is just weird as hell… she’s lost it.”

“Disgusting! I pray her soul gets saved!” another critic seemingly shouted from behind their screen.

Page Six reached out to Madonna’s reps for comment on the backlash but did not immediately hear back.

The seven-time Grammy winner is no stranger to stirring up controversy, however, as she had done so several times throughout her career.

The Vatican once suggested that people boycott Madonna’s Blond Ambition World Tour due to her 1989 “Like a Prayer” music video, per Entertainment Tonight.

The controversial video featured her kissing a black saint who was wrongly accused of murder and several religious symbols, such as burning crosses.

Her commercial with Pepsi was even pulled at the time, though Madonna was given permission to share it in September 2023.

“Artists are here to disturb the peace,” she wrote in the caption of an Instagram Reel at the time, as she debuted the commercial after it sat in the dark for 34 years.

Earlier this year, Madonna was sued by a fan who attended her “Celebration” tour and accused her of exposing fans to “pornography without warning.”

Her shows surely had some punch to them — as her backup dancers were routinely filmed giving raunchy lap dances on stage.

[From Page Six]

Ah yes, I remember that lawsuit from the California concertgoer who was “forced to watch topless women on stage.” In that instance I was leaning on Madonna’s side — Celebration was her 12th concert tour, I think it was fairly predictable that Madonna would have racy material, girl. But the difference with a concert is that an audience member chooses to purchase a ticket. The Vatican may correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think Pope Francis sanctified Madonna using him as an AI prop. There is so much that doesn’t make sense to me in regard to these images. What do the captions mean? She’s going into the weekend with the Pope, and he’s the only one who really sees her? Why is he seemingly canoodling with her, going off of the body language? But I think my biggest question of all is, Madge had to have known that the photos would quickly be identified as AI-generated. So… why?? What is she trying to say here? This isn’t my religion, so I’m not offended on those grounds; I’m offended by a celebrity with Madonna’s following making such a desperate attention grab. Heaven help her.

Note by CB: It looks like these photos were created by an AI/Photoshop artist named Rick Dick and that Madonna, or her social media person, just reposted them in her Instagram stories.

Photos via Instagram and credit: IPA/INSTARimages

Categories
instagram RuPaul

RuPaul’s advice on how to hold your hands in photos: don’t cross your arms




My great aunt (as in my grandmother’s sister, although she was great, too!) was famous in our family for always hitting the same, signature pose for photos: a very demure head tilt paired with a very mindful sideways stance so that her legs were faced 90 degrees away from the camera with her upper torso facing forward. When done correctly, the legs to the side made for a very slimming illusion! And the head tilt was just cute. I can’t ever recall her having a firm position on what to do with your hands, though. Luckily, Supermodel of the World RuPaul has us covered. Over the weekend Mama Ru found a spare moment between hosting Drag Race, Drag Race All Stars, Drag Race Global All Stars, Drag Race UK, and Lingo (#WhatEmmysLoss?) to post a little tutorial on Instagram on what to do with your hands — and what not to do with them! — when posing for the camera:

Don’t put your hands in your pockets. It makes you look dishonest, like you’re hiding something, and quite frankly, nervous. And it’s not a good silhouette. Don’t cross your arms for the same reason, it feels like you’re guarded and unapproachable. And also, when posing with other people, don’t put your arms around the other people, it makes the suit look bulky and it just doesn’t look great. What to do with your hands? I like to thread the needle. Put both fingertips together and clasp them right at your belly button. Looks fabulous. You can also put one arm down and one hand on your thigh, index finger right here. It creates a great silhouette and it makes you look approachable. Or you can forget all of those tips and just go full-on, Ebony Fashion Fair.

[From RuPaul’s Instagram via Seriously, OMG]

That final pose he does for the “full-on, Ebony Fashion Fair” is priceless, treat yourself and give it a watch! As for the rest of the tutorial, what do we think? I’m totally on board with not crossing your arms, it does indeed read as a defensive gesture. I mean, you’re literally covering yourself! And I’m also in agreement with RuPaul about not wrapping your arms around other people. Be the wrapp–ee, not the wrapp-er. But… no hands in your pockets?! I don’t think I can walk down that road with you, Mama Ru. Was this comment specific to suit-wearing? Because my practice for years now has been that I’ll rule out buying a dress if it doesn’t have pockets. Plus I thought having my hands in them gave more of a casual, easy-breezy vibe, instead of nervous and dishonest. I just think it takes more body language than simply putting hands in your pockets to communicate nerves or deceit. Or, on the flipside, I’m quite confident I could take RuPaul’s suggested “threading the needle” and hand-on-the-thigh poses and somehow make them awkward and unflattering. It’s called talent. But still, thanks for sharing your pearls of wisdom with us, Mama Ru! I will strive to live up to your long-limbed grace (and be the first to laugh at the inevitable flailing results).

Embed from Getty Images

Photos credit: ACE/INFphoto.com, Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/Avalon, Getty and via Instagram

Categories
Dating instagram Sofia Vergara

Sofia Vergara goes Instagram official with doctor boyfriend after her knee surgery




Last fall, a newly single Sofia Vergara was spotted out on a dinner date with orthopedic surgeon Justin Saliman. Saliman, who used to be married to The Ugly Truth star Bree Turner, invented the NovoStitch Pro Meniscal Repair System, which repairs knee joints. He sold that technology for $105 million in 2019. He’s also the grandson of one of the dudes who helped build the Hoover Dam. Things got somewhat quiet after their date, and their status was unknown until Sofia told Jimmy Fallon back in January that she was single and looking forward to dating the non-showbiz men of New York City. Everyone just assumed that it hadn’t worked out or perhaps they were keeping it casual.

It looks like Sofia and Justin reconnected at some point because not only are they back together, but they’re also now Instagram official! Sofia had knee surgery recently and posted a picture of her hot doctor boyfriend at her bedside (which technically looked more like a couch side). The caption read, “If u ever get a [major] knee surgery make sure u Geta handsome doctor who will sleep with u that night…!” Noted.

Sofía Vergara is in recovery! The Modern Family alum, 51, revealed on her Instagram Stories on Friday, April 12, that she underwent knee surgery — and was being cared for by her new boyfriend, orthopedic surgeon Justin Saliman.

“If u ever get a [major] knee surgery make sure u Get a handsome doctor who will sleep with u that night… ! Luv u,” the actress captioned a photo of Saliman smiling while wearing dark blue medical scrubs.

On her Instagram Stories on Saturday, April 13, while resting, she shared a video of a gag gift her fellow America’s Got Talent judge Howie Mandel got her. It appeared to be some kind of electric pogo stick.

She jokingly cursed out Mandel, 68, and then tagged him in an image of herself. Vergara was lounging on her couch in a bright magenta robe, with her leg in a complex knee brace. A dog was sitting on her lap.

As for her new relationship, Vergara — who announced her divorce from Joe Manganiello in July 2023 — was first spotted with Saliman in October 2023.

“She is enjoying life. She seems positive and full of energy,” a source told PEOPLE after their first date. “Sofía has been handling the divorce well. It wasn’t an easy decision, but she is doing great now.”

The insider added that the Griselda star was “dating and having fun” at the time.

[From People]

Hey, good for Sofia! I wish her nothing but happiness and am sure that Dr. Justin is taking very good care of her. I also hope her surgery went well! Hopefully, it wasn’t for anything too serious and she’ll have a quick recovery time. The extent of my knowledge about knee surgery is about the recovery process, actually. One summer while home from college, I worked the front desk at a physical therapy practice and they were always stressing how important it was to your recovery to make sure you do the exercises prescribed. Just like a music teacher with a student who doesn’t practice, these PTs always knew when someone wasn’t doing their exercises at home. I am sure that won’t be a problem for Sofia, especially if she’s sleeping with an orthopedic surgeon and has access to great PTs. Here’s to a speedy recovery for Sofia. We need new date night pictures now that we know they’re a thing.

Photos are credit: IMAGO/Jennifer Bloc / Avalon and via Instagram/People Magazine

Categories
Facebook instagram Technology

Meta will start labeling AI generated images on Instagram and Facebook




When it comes to Artificial Intelligence, it feels like we’re really crossing the Rubicon here. We’ve progressed from Alexa refusing to set a timer and Waze telling you to drive into a lake and into the world of dangerous, realistically-looking deepfakes. We already have serious issues with graphic deepfakes coming for the likes of high-school students, underage actresses, and Taylor Swift with little recourse to stop them once they’ve spread all over social media. There is currently no federal legislation regarding non-consensual, sexually explicit deepfakes and only one bill, introduced to the House of Representatives last year, that has stalled.

Deepfakes involve more than just explicit photos, though. There’s also a very real danger of nefarious persons using AI to sow misinformation to susceptible audiences. And once any of these images hit social media, it’s nearly impossible to contain them. In an effort to combat confusion (and worse), Meta has announced that in “the coming months,” they’re going to start labeling AI-created images uploaded to Facebook, Instagram, and Threads. Until then, they’re taking the YouTube/Tik Tok approach of relying on users to self-identify their artificial creations.

When an AI-generated image of the pope in a puffy white coat went viral last year, internet users debated whether the pontiff was really that stylish. Fake images of former President Donald Trump being arrested caused similar confusion, even though the person who generated the images said they were made with artificial intelligence. Soon, similar images posted on Instagram, Facebook or Threads may carry a label disclosing they were the product of sophisticated AI tools, which can generate highly plausible images, videos, audio and text from simple prompts.

Meta, which owns all three platforms, said on Tuesday that it will start labeling images created with leading artificial intelligence tools in the coming months. The move comes as tech companies — both those that build AI software and those that host its outputs — are coming under growing pressure to address the potential for the cutting-edge technology to mislead people.

Those concerns are particularly acute as millions of people vote in high-profile elections around the world this year. Experts and regulators have warned that deepfakes — digitally manipulated media — could be used to exacerbate efforts to mislead, discourage and manipulate voters.

Meta and others in the industry have been working to develop invisible markers, including watermarks and metadata, indicating that a piece of content has been created by AI. Meta said it will begin using those markers to apply labels in multiple languages on its apps, so users of its platforms will know whether what they’re seeing is real or fake.

“As the difference between human and synthetic content gets blurred, people want to know where the boundary lies,” Nick Clegg, Meta’s president of global affairs, wrote in a company blog post. “People are often coming across AI-generated content for the first time and our users have told us they appreciate transparency around this new technology. So it’s important that we help people know when photorealistic content they’re seeing has been created using AI.”

The labels will apply to images from Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Adobe, Midjourney and Shutterstock — but only once those companies start including watermarks and other technical metadata in images created by their software. Images created with Meta’s own AI tools are already labeled “Imagined with AI.”

That still leaves gaps. Other image generators, including open-source models, may never incorporate these kinds of markers. Meta said it’s working on tools to automatically detect AI content, even if that content doesn’t have watermarks or metadata. What’s more, Meta’s labels apply to only static photos. The company said it can’t yet label AI-generated audio or video this way because the industry has not started including that data in audio and video tools.

For now, Meta is relying on users to fill the void. On Tuesday, the company said that it will start requiring users to disclose when they post “a photorealistic video or realistic-sounding audio that was digitally created or altered” and that it may penalize accounts that fail to do so.

“If we determine that digitally created or altered image, video or audio content creates a particularly high risk of materially deceiving the public on a matter of importance, we may add a more prominent label if appropriate, so people have more information and context,” Clegg said.

That expands on Meta’s requirement, introduced in November, that political ads include a disclosure if they digitally generated or altered images, video or audio. TikTok and YouTube also require users to disclose when they post realistic AI-generated content. Last fall, TikTok said it would start testing automatically applying labels to content that it detects was created or edited with AI.

[From NRP]

Umm…it’s a start? Or is Meta just doing a little CYA? The “gaps” mentioned in the article seem pretty wide to me. Ugh. I’m not gonna lie: I’m terrified of the shenanigans and malarkey that will absolutely go down to mess up the elections processes worldwide. More than 60 countries will have national elections in 2024, which will represent just about half of the global population. The stakes are high and as we’ve seen over the last decade, it does not take much for misinformation to run rampant and be accepted as truth. I can absolutely see a scenario in which certain bad faith political actors use AI-generated propaganda featuring their opponents and when it’s labeled as such, they start crying “fake news” and claim they’re being targeted unfairly. Buckle up, friends. It’s going to be another stressful ride.

pic.twitter.com/VeAdxFduYJ

— Dr. Sarah Padilla Hanisko (@LuvsLikePi) January 14, 2024

I applaud Posta for using AI tech, but it’s important to also use this correctly.A few noticeable errors:1st lady has 3 hands, of which 1 of the fingers look misshapen. 2nd lady has no computer. There’s a ghost hand typing on the same keyboard the 3rd lady’s is using. https://t.co/wJNKZsrCmb pic.twitter.com/81iSTOSjKD

— Andriana Wanjiru Dominguez-CDMP ???????????????????????????????? (@ANdaihera) January 31, 2024

pic.twitter.com/jidZx4G8U7

— rare insults (@insultsrare) January 9, 2024

Categories
instagram Lana Del Rey

Lana Del Rey deleted her Instagram account again ‘this account is closing’




Lana Del Rey is one of my favorite music artists, despite the tone-deaf, offensive things she’s said in the past. My feelings about her are complicated. I love her music. I also think she has trouble learning from good-faith criticism, and gets defensive when people call her out instead of reflecting and growing. She continuously put her foot in her mouth in 2020, first with her infamous “question for the culture” post and then with the multiple posts she made about it afterwards. Girlfriend really needed to do some shadow work and introspection and stop being the poster girl for white feminism. Did she? I don’t know. But I guess she realized having social media might be something of a liability after that. In 2021, she deactivated her social media accounts, including her Instagram. But almost as soon as she did that, she reactivated @honeymoon on Instagram, which was initially created to promote her 2015 album of the same name. She made it private, and I was one of the 2 million people to get access before she closed it off. Lana’s Instagrams on @honeymoon were always pretty casual and oddly intimate. She also stayed away from saying anything controversial, as far as I saw. Well, now she’s shutting down @honeymoon, and didn’t really say why. This is in the midst of her appearances at several festivals, performing live for the first time in four years.

Lana Del Rey will no longer be providing updates to fans on social media.

The 37-year-old “Summertime Sadness” hitmaker quit social media back in 2021 but returned to Instagram to share content with her followers.

However, she shared a new message explaining her decision to depart the platform once again two years later.

“Thank you so much for everything,” she began the message, which was shared on her Instagram story. “Now that Rob‘s record is out and now you know where I’m touring this account is closing. Good luck and love u.”

[via Just Jared]

It’s kind of hilarious that Lana, who was accused of nepotism early in her career, has made her father Rob Grant a Nepo Daddy. When Lana left social media (for the most part) in 2021, she obliquely referenced doing other things besides music. I wonder if that plan is materializing now, and what it could be. I could see her being quite happy teaching ceramics at a high school or something like that. Or maybe she just wants more privacy. It’s interesting to me that Lana has just been able to do whatever the hell she wants, essentially, and Interscope (her record label) is fine with it. A quick rundown of what I mean: Aside from her first album, none of her music even approaches being radio friendly or a top 40 hit. She takes selfies in her car and uses them as cover art for her singles. She did no promotion for her eighth album, Blue Banisters. I know someone who works in the same industry and has dealt directly with Lana’s people, and let’s just say it’s as chaotic on the back end sometimes as it is on the front. Her album releases are often delayed for mysterious reasons. Now here she is doing shows at these giant festivals, including Glastonbury and Outside Lands, and you’d think she’d be obligated to do more to promote them. But instead she just opts out of social media! She gets away with a lot in terms of image management, promotion, and social media presence. But Lana does sell records in an era where that’s hard to do, so that’s likely why.

Anyway I think she’ll be back to Instagram. Whatever she says to the contrary, Lana likes attention and wants to be seen. There’s a verified Insta account called @oceanblvd that was created around the same time as the release of her most recent album, Did You Know That There’s A Tunnel Under Ocean Boulevard. (Any run-on sentence can be a Lana song title now. It’s become a joke within the fandom. “Drinking cherry Coke on a Pendleton blanket under the oak tree on the hill above the 405”? Coming soon to a sad-girl playlist near you!) She’ll probably be on the Ocean Boulevard account in two months, sharing typewritten poetry, polaroids of herself with her siblings, and randomly visiting chili cook-offs in Long Beach.

photos credit: Fayes Vision/startraksphoto.com/Cover Images, MHD/Avalon and Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/Avalon

Categories
instagram Social Media

Instagram is losing users to more photo-centric apps after trying to copy TikTok




Kylie Jenner is the most popular person on Instagram with 365 million followers

I keep hearing about this on NPR and it’s worth talking about. Instagram has recently been testing changes to its algorithm, particularly by favoring reels – short videos that mimic TikTok’s format – and more heavily featuring ads and suggested content. Instagram is not staying in their lane and is instead going after that sweet Gen Z market share. This is annoying many users, particularly artists, and high profile users like Kylie Jenner have complained about it. What’s more is that users are going to more photo-centric platforms like old school Flickr and Tumblr and new alternatives including Glass. Axios has a quick writeup that breaks it down very well and there’s more at the source:

Photographers, designers and other creative types turned off by Instagram’s pivot to TikTok-like features are tentatively moving to alternative platforms.

Why it matters: Instagram has long been a digital gallery space for artists of all kinds, helping them find an audience, connect with other creatives and land paid gigs.

But the Meta-owned platform’s gradual evolution into an ad- and shopping-heavy app that favors short-form video and algorithmically selected content has left the future of digital art-sharing in flux.

The context: Instagram has been de-emphasizing still imagery for years. But more recent changes, such as a focus on shopping and a big increase in the amount of suggested content that appears in users’ feeds, has forced a reckoning.

Instagram became a worldwide phenomenon thanks to its focus on “visual storytelling,” writes photographer and tech journalist Om Malik. But, he says, it’s now “all about marketing and selling substandard products and mediocre services by influencers with less depth than a sheet of paper.”

Instagram head Adam Mosseri recently walked back some of the most controversial changes, though he signaled that the Instagram of yore will not be returning.

A handful of rival apps and platforms are reporting recent spikes in user activity.

They include relatively new upstarts, like Glass (for photographers of all kinds) and Grainery (for film photographers, specifically).

Even old favorites like Flickr — a pioneer in digital photography-sharing that owned the loyalty of serious photographers in the mid-2000s — are seeing a boost, and some creatives are turning back to Tumblr, another longtime artist haven. Still others are headed to VSCO, which got its start as a photo editing tool before pivoting into a sharing platform.

[From Axios]

I used to use TikTok occasionally but have uninstalled it because it’s incredibly addictive. I also noticed that it was changing what I was interested in. I only use Instagram a few times a day and of course it’s not as immersive as TikTok, but it’s for photos and those don’t keep your attention as long. I have noticed more reels and suggested posts in my feed there so I just haven’t used it as much. The change in Instagram’s format shows what the apps strive for – to keep us glued to them to capitalize on our time and shape our interests as consumers. They don’t want to provide a service, they exist to make money. It’s what happens when companies favor growth above user experience, and it has such a chilling effect on individuals and on society. They try to get us hooked so that they can sell our time. Instagram surely did all kinds of calculations about the trade off in revenue for changing their business model. They rolled some of that back but they’ll keep pushing to favor cash over people.

As an aside I’m so grateful that Twitter remains the same. It will surely change eventually but it’s my favorite platform. Pinterest deserves credit for staying true to their userbase too.